Motorola Edge 40 vs Honor 200 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Edge 40
Motorola Edge 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date May 4, 2023 May 31, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 86.68 cm³ 100.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.92 "/g 3.41 "/g
Weight 167 g 199 g
Height 158.4 mm 163.3 mm
Width 72 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Eclipse Black
  • Nebula Green
  • Viva Magenta
  • Lunar Blue
  • Black
  • Pink
  • Moonlight White
  • Ocean Cyan

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1224 x 2700
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.8 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 437 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 102.56 mAh/in² 113.12 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.76 mAh/cm³ 51.64 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4400 mAh 5200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 15 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Edge 40Honor 200 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.4 x 72 x 7.6163.3 x 75.2 x 8.2Honor 200 Pro is larger and slightly thicker.
Weight (g)167199Motorola Edge 40 is noticeably lighter, enhancing one-handed use.
Display
Display TypeP-OLEDOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. P-OLED potentially offers better power efficiency.
Size (inches)6.556.78Honor 200 Pro provides a larger viewing area for media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001224 x 2700Honor 200 Pro has a sharper display, noticeable in text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120Motorola Edge 40 offers smoother animations and scrolling, beneficial for gaming and fast-paced content.
Peak Brightness (nits)12004000Honor 200 Pro will be significantly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is generally more powerful, enabling faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Honor 200 Pro's CPU architecture suggests a significant performance advantage in demanding tasks.
RAM (GB)812More RAM on the Honor 200 Pro allows for more apps to run in the background without reloading.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable resolution; image quality will depend on sensor and processing.
Other Cameras13MP Wide + Macro, 32MP Selfie12MP Wide, 50MP Telephoto, 50MP SelfieHonor 200 Pro offers more versatile camera options with a dedicated telephoto lens and a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video CapabilitiesUp to 4K@30fps, 720p@960fpsUp to 4K@30fpsBoth offer 4K recording, but Motorola Edge 40 has a higher slow-motion capability. Missing detail regarding Honor 200 Pro's slow-motion capabilities prevents full comparison.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)44005200Honor 200 Pro has significantly larger battery capacity, likely resulting in longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 40 Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: Easier to handle and pocket.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother visual experience.
  • Lower Price: Offers good value for its features.

Honor 200 Pro Advantages:

  • More Powerful Processor: Better performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Larger and Sharper Display: More immersive media consumption.
  • Larger Battery: Longer battery life.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Telephoto lens offers greater zoom capabilities. Higher resolution selfie camera.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 40: Users prioritizing a lightweight, compact phone with a smooth display and good value. Ideal for everyday tasks, web browsing, social media, and casual gaming.

Honor 200 Pro: Users who demand top-tier performance, a large and sharp display, long battery life, and a versatile camera system. Suitable for power users, mobile gamers, photographers, and content creators.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Honor 200 Pro is significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your performance needs? For demanding tasks, the Honor 200 Pro is superior.
  3. What is your priority in a display? Smoother refresh rate (Motorola) vs. larger size and sharper resolution (Honor).

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Everyday Use: Motorola Edge 40
  • Power User, Demanding Tasks: Honor 200 Pro
  • Photographer/Content Creator: Honor 200 Pro

My Choice: Honor 200 Pro

While the Motorola Edge 40 offers a compelling combination of features and value, I would choose the Honor 200 Pro. The significantly more powerful processor, larger battery, sharper display, and versatile camera system outweigh the higher price and larger size for me. I prioritize performance and long battery life, and the Honor 200 Pro excels in these areas. The inclusion of a telephoto lens greatly enhances photographic capabilities, which is important to me. The slight increase in size is acceptable considering the larger screen real estate for media consumption. While the higher refresh rate of the Motorola is appealing, the overall performance and features of the Honor 200 Pro make it the more compelling device for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.