Motorola Edge 40 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F5 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 4, 2023 May 1, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 102.59 cm³ 95.45 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.35 "/g 3.69 "/g
Weight 199 g 181 g
Height 161.2 mm 161.1 mm
Width 74 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Interstellar Black
  • Lunar Blue
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90 % 88.9 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 103.40 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.84 mAh/cm³ 52.38 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4600 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 740 Adreno 725

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version 1.4 N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Edge 40 ProXiaomi Poco F5Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.2 x 74 x 8.6161.1 x 75 x 7.9Poco F5 is slightly thinner and lighter.
Weight (g)199181Noticeable difference in hand feel, Poco F5 will feel less bulky.
BuildBuild materials not specified for either phone, limiting comparison.
Display
Display TypeOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer excellent contrast and deep blacks. Subjective preference for color vibrancy may apply.
Display Size (inches)6.676.67Identical screen sizes.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Same resolution, sharpness will be comparable.
Refresh Rate (Hz)165120Edge 40 Pro offers smoother scrolling and animations, especially noticeable in gaming.
Peak Brightness (nits)13001000Edge 40 Pro will be more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2Edge 40 Pro significantly more powerful, enabling smoother multitasking and high-end gaming.
CPUOcta-core (up to 3.2 GHz)Octa-core (up to 2.91 GHz)Edge 40 Pro has a faster, more powerful CPU.
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 725Edge 40 Pro has a superior GPU for demanding graphics tasks.
RAM (GB)128/12The reviewed Poco F5 has 8GB, less than the Edge 40 Pro's 12GB, impacting multitasking performance. A 12GB variant of the Poco F5 exists but wasn't included in this comparison.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5064Poco F5 has a higher resolution main sensor. Image quality depends on many factors beyond resolution.
Ultrawide (MP)508Edge 40 Pro boasts a much higher resolution ultrawide lens, capturing more detail.
Telephoto (MP)12N/AEdge 40 Pro offers optical zoom, absent in the Poco F5.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsEdge 40 Pro supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)46005000Poco F5 has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedUnable to compare charging speeds without specific data.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 40 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher refresh rate display: Smoother scrolling and animations enhance the user experience.
  • Brighter display: Better visibility in sunlight.
  • Higher resolution ultrawide camera: Captures more detailed wide-angle shots.
  • Optical zoom: Provides versatility for capturing distant subjects.
  • Higher resolution video recording: Captures more detail in videos.

Xiaomi Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Lower price: Offers excellent value for its performance.
  • Larger battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • Lighter and thinner: More comfortable to hold and carry.

Trade-offs:

  • Poco F5: Sacrifices performance, display quality, and camera versatility for a lower price.
  • Edge 40 Pro: Higher price for premium features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 40 Pro: Ideal for power users, gamers, and those who prioritize performance, display quality, and camera versatility. Excellent for demanding tasks, content creation, and mobile gaming.

Xiaomi Poco F5: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize value and battery life. Great for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F5 offers significant value for its price, while the Edge 40 Pro commands a premium.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Demanding tasks and gaming favor the Edge 40 Pro, while everyday use and long battery life favor the Poco F5.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize performance, display, and camera? Choose the Edge 40 Pro. Prioritize value and battery life? Choose the Poco F5.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 40 Pro

While the Poco F5 offers incredible value, I would choose the Motorola Edge 40 Pro. The significant performance difference provided by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, combined with the superior display and more versatile camera system, outweighs the price difference and larger battery of the Poco F5 for me. I prioritize a smooth, responsive user experience and high-quality media consumption, which the Edge 40 Pro delivers. The higher refresh rate display and brighter screen are also significant factors in my decision. While I acknowledge the Poco F5's strengths in battery and price, the Edge 40 Pro better aligns with my personal needs and preferences.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.