Motorola Edge 40 Pro vs Oppo Reno12 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 4, 2023 June 18, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 102.59 cm³ 89.39 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.35 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 199 g 180 g
Height 161.2 mm 161.5 mm
Width 74 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Interstellar Black
  • Lunar Blue
  • Space Brown
  • Sunset Gold
  • Nebula Silver
  • Manish Malhotra

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90 % 89.4 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 103.40 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.84 mAh/cm³ 55.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4600 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 740 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version 1.4 N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Edge 40 ProOppo Reno12 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.2 x 74 x 8.6161.5 x 74.8 x 7.4Oppo is slightly thinner and lighter.
Weight (g)199180Noticeable difference in hand, Oppo may feel more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Display TypeOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer excellent contrast and vibrant colors. Practical differences are minimal for most users.
Display Size (inches)6.676.7Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2412Virtually identical sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)165120Motorola offers smoother scrolling and animations, beneficial for gaming and fast-paced content.
Peak Brightness (nits)13001200Motorola can be slightly more readable in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2Dimensity 7300Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 significantly outperforms in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Motorola's CPU offers superior performance and efficiency.
GPUAdreno 740Mali-G615 MC2Adreno 740 provides a much more powerful graphics processing capability.
RAM (GB)1212Both offer ample RAM for multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Resolution is similar, but sensor and processing will determine actual image quality. We lack detailed sensor information to make a thorough comparison.
Ultrawide (MP)508Motorola has a vastly superior ultrawide camera in terms of resolution.
Telephoto (MP)1250Oppo boasts a higher resolution telephoto lens, potentially offering better zoom capabilities, although optical zoom specs are more crucial and are not fully available.
Selfie (MP)6050Motorola offers a higher resolution front-facing camera.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsMotorola supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)46005000Oppo offers a larger battery, potentially leading to longer battery life. However, real-world usage depends on optimization.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare charging speeds without specific data.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 40 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers a major performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher refresh rate display: Smoother and more responsive user experience.
  • Higher resolution ultrawide camera: Captures more detail in wide shots.
  • 8K video recording: Future-proofs content creation.

Oppo Reno12 Pro Advantages:

  • Larger battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • Lower price: Offers good value for its features.
  • Lighter and thinner design: More comfortable for one-handed use.

Trade-offs:

  • Motorola: Higher price for superior performance. Smaller battery.
  • Oppo: Lower performance for a lower price. Less capable ultrawide camera.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 40 Pro: Users who prioritize performance, smooth display, and high-quality cameras. Ideal for gamers, power users, and content creators.

Oppo Reno12 Pro: Users who prioritize battery life, affordability, and a comfortable design. Suitable for everyday tasks, social media, and casual photography. Price-conscious buyers seeking good value.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Motorola is significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? Gaming and demanding tasks benefit from the Motorola's power.
  3. How important is battery life? The Oppo's larger battery might be crucial for heavy users.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Motorola Edge 40 Pro
  • Photographer/Videographer: While both have promising camera setups, we lack detail to definitively recommend one. Leaning towards Motorola due to 8K recording and better ultrawide.
  • Everyday User on a Budget: Oppo Reno12 Pro
  • Power User: Motorola Edge 40 Pro

My Choice: Motorola Edge 40 Pro

While the Oppo Reno12 Pro offers a compelling price-to-value proposition, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's superior performance, smoother display, and more versatile camera system (particularly the ultrawide) make it the better choice for me. I prioritize a fluid user experience and having the latest technology, and am willing to pay the premium for the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The difference in battery capacity is less of a concern for my usage patterns. The significantly better ultrawide is a huge factor in my decision. I often use the ultrawide lens, and the 8MP offering on the Oppo is simply not competitive in today's market.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.