Motorola Edge 40 Pro vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 4, 2023 September 20, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 102.59 cm³ 104.99 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.35 "/g 3.04 "/g
Weight 199 g 227 g
Height 161.2 mm 163 mm
Width 74 mm 77.6 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Interstellar Black
  • Lunar Blue
  • Black Titanium
  • White Titanium
  • Natural Titanium
  • Desert Titanium

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1320 x 2868
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90 % 92.2 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 2000 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 103.40 mAh/in² 98.40 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.84 mAh/cm³ 44.63 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4600 mAh 4685 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Apple A18 Pro (3 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) Hexa-core (2x4.05 GHz + 4x2.42 GHz)
GPU Adreno 740 Apple GPU (6-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1 1
DisplayPort Version 1.4 N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 USB Type-C 3.2, Gen 2, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 13 18
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Edge 40 ProApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.2 x 74 x 8.6163 x 77.6 x 8.3iPhone 16 Pro Max is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight (g)199227Edge 40 Pro is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild materials impact durability and premium feel; information lacking here.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.9iPhone has a larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001320 x 2868iPhone has a sharper display with higher pixel density (460 vs 394 PPI), resulting in clearer text and images.
TypeOLED, 165HzLTPO OLED, 120HzBoth are OLED with excellent color and contrast. iPhone's LTPO allows for variable refresh rate, saving battery. Motorola's higher refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness1300 nits2000 nitsiPhone's significantly higher peak brightness ensures better visibility outdoors.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2Apple A18 ProBoth are top-tier chipsets, promising excellent performance. Apple's A18 Pro, being newer and built on a smaller process node (3nm vs 4nm), is likely to offer better performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Hexa-core (2x4.05 GHz + 4x2.42 GHz)Both CPUs are powerful, but architectural differences make direct comparison difficult without benchmarks.
GPUAdreno 740Apple GPU (6-core)Apple's GPUs are generally considered market-leading in performance; real-world gaming and graphics intensive task comparison needed.
RAM12GB8GBMotorola has more RAM, potentially benefiting multitasking, although iOS's memory management is highly optimized.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP Main, 50MP Wide, 12MP Telephoto48MP Main, 48MP Wide, 12MP Telephoto, ToF 3DBoth have triple camera systems with similar resolutions. iPhone adds a ToF sensor for improved depth sensing in AR applications and portrait mode. Specific sensor models and lens quality will impact image quality, detailed comparison not possible with this data.
DxOMark Score130157iPhone 16 Pro Max scores significantly higher in DxOMark, suggesting superior overall camera performance. However, real-world image comparison is crucial.
Video8K@30fps, 4K@60fps4K@120fps, Dolby VisionBoth offer high-resolution video recording. iPhone supports higher frame rates at 4K for smoother slow-motion.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)46004685Very similar battery capacities. Real-world battery life depends on optimization and usage patterns.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 40 Pro Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: Noticeably more comfortable for extended use and one-handed operation.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and animations.
  • More RAM: Potentially benefits multitasking, though iOS optimization might mitigate this.

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and pixel density for crisper visuals.
  • Brighter Display: Superior outdoor visibility.
  • More Powerful Chipset: Likely to deliver superior performance and efficiency.
  • Higher DxOMark Camera Score: Suggests better overall camera quality.
  • Higher Frame Rate Video Recording: Smoother slow-motion capture at 4K.
  • LTPO Display: Dynamic refresh rate for better battery optimization.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 40 Pro: Users prioritizing a lighter phone, smooth display, and a more affordable price within the high-end range.

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max: Users prioritizing performance, camera quality, display brightness, and a seamless integration within the Apple ecosystem. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and professional photography.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Operating System Preference: iOS or Android?
  2. Prioritization of Features: Performance, camera, display, or battery life?
  3. Budget: Is the price premium for the iPhone 16 Pro Max justified for your needs?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: iPhone 16 Pro Max for its superior performance.
  • Photographer/Videographer: iPhone 16 Pro Max for its higher-rated camera and advanced video features.
  • Casual User: Motorola Edge 40 Pro might offer sufficient performance at a potentially lower price.

My Choice: Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

While the Motorola Edge 40 Pro offers a compelling package with its lighter weight and higher refresh rate display, the iPhone 16 Pro Max's superior performance (A18 Pro chip), brighter and sharper display, higher-rated camera system, and the advantages of the iOS ecosystem make it the better overall choice for me. The slightly heavier weight is a trade-off I'm willing to accept for the significant gains in other areas. The iPhone's LTPO display, although having a lower refresh rate, contributes to better battery life in the long run. Additionally, the more mature and consistent software updates in the Apple ecosystem are a significant factor in my decision.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.