Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 14, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 90.78 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.85 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 170 g 189 g
Height 159.6 mm 164.1 mm
Width 72 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Soothing Sea
  • Caneel Bay
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.1 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.54 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 55.08 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G610 MC3 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Edge 40 NeoZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)159.6 x 72 x 7.9164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6The Motorola is noticeably smaller and thinner, making it more pocketable and comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)170189The Motorola is lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Fingerprint SensorUnder displaySide-mountedPreference-based, but under-display is often perceived as more modern.
Display
Display TypeP-OLEDIPS LCDThe Motorola's OLED offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612The Motorola's display is significantly sharper, resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)14490The Motorola's 144Hz display provides a smoother and more responsive user experience, especially noticeable in gaming and scrolling.
Peak Brightness (nits)1300Not specifiedThe Motorola's high peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. The lack of data for the ZTE makes a direct comparison impossible.
Performance
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)The Motorola's chip is built on a smaller process, suggesting better power efficiency and potentially higher performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)The Motorola has faster and more powerful CPU cores, leading to better performance in demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUMali-G610 MC3Mali-G57 MP1The Motorola's GPU is more powerful, offering smoother gaming and graphics performance.
RAM12GB4GBThe significantly higher RAM in the Motorola allows for more apps to run in the background and smoother multitasking.
Storage256GB256GBBoth offer the same storage capacity.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps, various 1080p options with EIS1080p@30fpsThe Motorola offers superior video recording capabilities, including 4K resolution and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) at various frame rates for smoother footage.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both have the same battery capacity, but actual battery life will depend on other factors like display and processor efficiency.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 40 Neo Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Significantly sharper, smoother, and more vibrant due to OLED technology, higher resolution, and 144Hz refresh rate.
  • Higher Performance: More powerful processor and significantly more RAM for smooth multitasking and demanding tasks.
  • Better Video Recording: Offers 4K resolution and EIS for superior video quality.
  • More Compact Design: Smaller and lighter for easier one-handed use.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Belongs to a lower price range.

Trade-offs:

  • The ZTE likely sacrifices performance, display quality, and features for a lower price point.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 40 Neo: Users who value performance, a high-quality display, smooth gaming, and a compact design. Ideal for:

  • Mobile gamers
  • Power users
  • Content consumers (video streaming, social media)

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Users on a tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and long battery life over performance and premium features. Ideal for:

  • Basic communication (calls, texting)
  • Light web browsing
  • Less demanding users

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The ZTE is expected to be significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary use cases? (e.g., gaming, photography, basic communication)
  3. How important are display quality and performance?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Use: ZTE Blade A75 4G
  • Balanced Budget, All-Around Use: Motorola Edge 40 Neo
  • Performance and Display Enthusiast: Motorola Edge 40 Neo

My Choice: Motorola Edge 40 Neo

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo offers a significantly better user experience due to its superior display, performance, and more compact design. While the ZTE Blade A75 4G might be cheaper, the compromises in key areas like performance and display would significantly impact daily usage. The Motorola's 12GB RAM, powerful processor, and 144Hz OLED display make it a clear winner for a smoother and more enjoyable smartphone experience. Even without knowing the exact price difference, the value proposition of the Edge 40 Neo seems much stronger for anything beyond very basic smartphone usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.