Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 14, 2023 May 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 90.78 cm³ 98.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.85 "/g 3.19 "/g
Weight 170 g 209 g
Height 159.6 mm 160.9 mm
Width 72 mm 75 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Soothing Sea
  • Caneel Bay
  • Black
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1440 x 3200
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.1 % 89 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 526 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 700 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.54 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 55.08 mAh/cm³ 50.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G610 MC3 Adreno 740

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 15 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Edge 40 NeoXiaomi Poco F6 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mmPoco F6 Pro is slightly larger and thicker. Neo is more pocketable.
Weight170g209gNeo is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size6.55"6.67"Poco F6 Pro offers a slightly larger viewing area.
TypeP-OLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Practical differences are minimal for most users.
Resolution1080 x 24001440 x 3200Poco F6 Pro has a significantly sharper display, beneficial for media consumption and detail-oriented tasks.
Refresh Rate144Hz120HzNeo offers a higher refresh rate, resulting in smoother animations and scrolling. However, the difference between 120Hz and 144Hz is subtle.
Peak Brightness1300 nits4000 nitsPoco F6 Pro is significantly brighter, ensuring better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm)Poco F6 Pro boasts a significantly more powerful processor, leading to much faster performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Poco F6 Pro offers superior processing power and efficiency.
GPUMali-G610 MC3Adreno 740Poco F6 Pro's Adreno 740 GPU provides a significant advantage in gaming and graphics-intensive applications.
RAM12GB12GB/16GBBoth offer ample RAM for multitasking, though the Poco F6 Pro offers a 16GB option for even more headroom.
Storage256GB512GB/1TBPoco F6 Pro offers significantly more storage capacity.
Camera
Video CapabilitiesUp to 4K@30fpsUp to 8K@24fpsPoco F6 Pro supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhBoth phones have the same battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend on usage and optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 40 Neo Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: Noticeably easier to handle and carry.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and animations, though the difference compared to 120Hz is minimal.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Given the older release date and less powerful specs.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly More Powerful: Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers a major performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Sharper and Brighter Display: Higher resolution and peak brightness provide a superior visual experience.
  • More Storage Options: Provides ample space for apps, media, and files.
  • Higher Resolution Video Recording: Captures more detail in videos.

Trade-offs:

  • Poco F6 Pro: Heavier and larger, potentially less comfortable for one-handed use. Higher price.
  • Neo: Less powerful, noticeable performance difference in demanding tasks. Less sharp display. Limited storage.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 40 Neo:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users prioritizing a lightweight and compact phone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming.
  • Use Cases: Casual gaming, social media, web browsing, general productivity.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro:

  • Ideal User: Power users and gamers seeking top-tier performance, a stunning display, and ample storage.
  • Use Cases: Demanding mobile gaming, professional photography/videography, multitasking, content creation.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F6 Pro is likely more expensive.
  2. What is your primary phone usage? Casual use vs. demanding tasks/gaming.
  3. Do you prioritize portability and comfort or performance and display quality?

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro

While the Motorola Edge 40 Neo offers a compelling combination of lightness and a smooth display at a potentially lower price, the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro's significantly superior performance, sharper and brighter display, and ample storage make it the better choice for me. I prioritize a smooth and responsive experience for demanding tasks and gaming, and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 delivers that. The improved display and larger storage are also significant advantages that outweigh the slightly larger size and weight. The price difference is justifiable for the substantial performance leap. I value future-proofing my device, and the Poco F6 Pro's powerful hardware ensures it will remain capable for longer.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.