Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 14, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 90.78 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.85 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 170 g 213 g
Height 159.6 mm 161.1 mm
Width 72 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Soothing Sea
  • Caneel Bay
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.1 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.54 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 55.08 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G610 MC3 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 15 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Edge 40 NeoSamsung Galaxy A55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mmThe Motorola is noticeably narrower and slightly thinner, making it potentially more comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight170g213gThe Motorola is significantly lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Display TypeP-OLEDSuper AMOLEDBoth offer excellent color accuracy and deep blacks. Subjective preference will determine which looks better.
Size6.55"6.6"Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical pixel density, resulting in similar sharpness.
Refresh Rate144Hz120HzThe Motorola's higher refresh rate provides smoother animations and scrolling, especially noticeable in gaming and fast-paced content.
Peak Brightness1300 nitsNot specifiedThe Motorola's significantly higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. The lack of this specification for the Samsung makes a direct comparison impossible.
Performance
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm)Exynos 1480 (4nm)The Samsung's 4nm process suggests better power efficiency and potentially higher performance, but real-world performance depends on optimization.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)The Samsung has higher clocked performance cores, potentially offering better performance in demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G610 MC3Xclipse 530Difficult to compare without benchmarks. Both should handle everyday tasks and moderate gaming well.
RAM12GB8GB/12GBThe base Samsung model having less RAM could impact multitasking performance.
Camera
Video CapabilitiesUp to 4K@30fps, 1080p@240fpsUp to 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fpsThe Motorola offers significantly higher slow-motion video recording capabilities.
Other Camera SpecsNot providedNot providedInsufficient information for comparison.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity suggests similar battery life, but actual usage will depend on software optimization and user habits.
Software
OSAndroid 13Android 14The Samsung ships with a newer Android version, offering potential feature advantages and longer software support.
OS Max Version1518The Samsung will receive longer software updates, crucial for security and new features.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 40 Neo Advantages:

  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother user experience.
  • Higher Peak Brightness: Better outdoor visibility.
  • Lighter and Narrower: Enhanced one-handed usability.
  • Superior Slow-Motion Video: More creative video recording options.

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • More Powerful CPU: Potentially better performance in demanding tasks.
  • More Efficient Chipset (4nm): Potentially better battery life.
  • Newer Android Version & Longer Support: Access to latest features and longer security updates.
  • RAM Options: Provides flexibility in choosing the right configuration.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 40 Neo: Ideal for users prioritizing a smooth display experience, comfortable one-handed use, and extensive slow-motion video capabilities. Suitable for gamers, social media enthusiasts, and content consumers.

Samsung Galaxy A55: Ideal for users who value long-term software support, potentially better performance for demanding applications, and the latest Android features. Suitable for users who keep their phones for extended periods and prioritize software updates.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is display smoothness and brightness? The Motorola excels in both areas.
  2. Do you prioritize the latest software and long-term updates? The Samsung offers a clear advantage here.
  3. Is one-handed usability and a lightweight design a priority? The Motorola is the better choice.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A55

While the Motorola Edge 40 Neo offers a compelling display and design, the Samsung Galaxy A55's longer software support, potentially superior performance due to the more powerful CPU and more efficient chipset, and newer Android version make it a more future-proof choice for me. The significantly longer software support outweighs the Motorola's advantages in refresh rate and brightness. While the Motorola is lighter and more comfortable to hold, I prioritize software updates and longevity. The lack of detailed camera specifications makes a complete comparison difficult, but I am willing to bet on Samsung's generally good camera performance. Ultimately, the peace of mind offered by extended software updates and the potential performance advantages of the Samsung make it the preferable option in my opinion.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.