Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs Samsung Galaxy A25 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 14, 2023 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 90.78 cm³ 102.23 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.85 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 170 g 197 g
Height 159.6 mm 161 mm
Width 72 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Soothing Sea
  • Caneel Bay
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.1 % 84.2 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.54 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 55.08 mAh/cm³ 48.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G610 MC3 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 15 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Edge 40 NeoSamsung Galaxy A25Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm161 x 76.5 x 8.3 mmThe Motorola is noticeably narrower and slightly thinner, making it potentially more comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight170g197gThe Motorola is significantly lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Fingerprint SensorUnder DisplaySide-mountedUnder-display sensors are generally considered more modern and aesthetically pleasing, though side-mounted can be faster to access.
Display
Size6.55"6.5"Negligible real-world difference in screen size.
TypeP-OLEDSuper AMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. P-OLED can offer potential power savings advantages.
Refresh Rate144Hz120HzThe Motorola's higher refresh rate will result in smoother animations and scrolling, especially noticeable in gaming.
Peak Brightness1300 nits1000 nits (HBM)The Motorola's significantly higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 7030 (6nm)Exynos 1280 (5nm)While the Exynos is built on a smaller node (suggesting potential efficiency), real-world performance depends on optimization.
CPU2x2.5 GHz A78, 6x2.0 GHz A552x2.4 GHz A78, 6x2.0 GHz A55Very similar CPU configurations; performance differences will likely be minimal.
GPUMali-G610 MC3Mali-G68The Mali-G68 generally offers better graphical performance than the G610 MC3, potentially impacting gaming performance.
RAM12GB8GBThe Motorola's extra RAM allows for more apps to run in the background without reloading, improving multitasking.
Storage256GB256GBBoth offer ample storage for average users.
Camera
Video CapabilitiesUp to 4K@30fps, 1080p@240fpsUp to 4K@30fpsThe Motorola offers more versatile slow-motion video recording options. Missing details about specific camera sensors limit analysis.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity; real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and usage patterns.
Software
OSAndroid 13Android 14The Galaxy A25 launches with a newer Android version, likely offering more features and longer software support.
OS Max Version1518The Galaxy A25 is projected to receive longer software updates, crucial for security and new features.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 40 Neo Advantages:

  • Lighter and more compact design: Enhances one-handed usability and reduces fatigue.
  • Smoother Display: 144Hz refresh rate provides a more fluid user experience.
  • Brighter Display: Better visibility outdoors.
  • More RAM: Improved multitasking performance.
  • More versatile slow-motion video: Captures smoother and more dramatic slow-motion footage.

Samsung Galaxy A25 Advantages:

  • Newer Android Version and Longer Software Support: Ensures access to the latest features and security patches for a longer period.
  • Potentially More Powerful GPU: Could offer a better gaming experience.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 40 Neo: Ideal for users who prioritize a smooth and responsive display, a lightweight and compact design, and value for money. Excellent for web browsing, social media, and casual gaming.

Samsung Galaxy A25: Suitable for users who prioritize long-term software updates and potentially a better gaming experience. Good for users who keep their phones for extended periods.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. How important is software update longevity?
  2. Do you prioritize a smooth display and lightweight design or potentially better gaming performance?
  3. What is your budget? (While both are mid-range, actual pricing should be compared).

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer on a budget: Lean towards the Galaxy A25 if real-world benchmarks confirm superior gaming performance.
  • User who values longevity: The Galaxy A25's longer software support makes it a better long-term investment.
  • User prioritizing one-handed use and a fluid display: The Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the clear winner.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 40 Neo

While longer software support is valuable, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's superior display (higher refresh rate and brightness), lighter and more compact design, and extra RAM outweigh the benefits of the Galaxy A25 for my personal needs. I prioritize daily usability and a fluid user experience, and the Neo excels in these areas. The difference in GPU performance is unlikely to be a significant factor for my usage patterns. Finally, the noticeably lighter weight of the Neo is a significant advantage for comfortable extended use. I am willing to accept the shorter software update cycle for the immediate benefits offered by the Neo.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.