Motorola Edge 30 Pro vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 4, 2022 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 109.08 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 196 g 184.5 g
Height 163.1 mm 170.8 mm
Width 76 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Cosmos Blue
  • Stardust White
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.4 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 106.93 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4800 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version 1.4 N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13 16

Comparison Summary

Motorola Edge 30 Pro vs. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: A Deep Dive

The smartphone landscape is constantly evolving, and Motorola continues to push boundaries with both powerhouse flagships and innovative foldables. Today, we'll dissect the Motorola Edge 30 Pro, a traditional slab phone, and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, a cutting-edge foldable, to help you determine which device best suits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Edge 30 ProMotorola Razr 40 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Form FactorStandardFoldableRazr 40 Ultra offers pocket portability and a unique form factor; Edge 30 Pro provides a familiar, larger screen experience.
Dimensions163.1 x 76 x 8.8 mm170.8 x 74 x 7 mmRazr 40 Ultra is taller and thinner when unfolded, significantly more compact when folded; Edge 30 Pro is wider and thicker overall.
Weight196g184.5gRazr 40 Ultra is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.7"6.9"Razr 40 Ultra boasts a slightly larger main display.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2640Razr 40 Ultra has a slightly sharper display due to higher resolution.
Refresh Rate144Hz165HzRazr 40 Ultra offers incredibly smooth scrolling and animations; Edge 30 Pro is also very smooth.
Brightness0 nits (Unspecified)1400 nitsRazr 40 Ultra's exceptional brightness ensures superb outdoor visibility; Missing brightness data for the Edge 30 Pro hinders a complete comparison.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 1Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Razr 40 Ultra's slightly newer processor offers a performance boost and potentially better power efficiency.
AnTuTu1,061,4001,238,000Razr 40 Ultra demonstrates a noticeable performance advantage in benchmarks, translating to faster app loading and smoother multitasking.
RAM8GB/12GB8GB/12GBBoth phones offer ample RAM for demanding tasks and multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.812MP, f/1.5Edge 30 Pro boasts significantly higher resolution for detailed photos; Razr 40 Ultra's wider aperture might offer better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera60MP, f/2.232MP, f/2.45Edge 30 Pro features a higher-resolution selfie camera.
Battery Life
Capacity4800mAh3800mAhEdge 30 Pro has a considerably larger battery, likely resulting in significantly longer battery life.
Charging68W Wired, 15W Wireless30W Wired, 8W WirelessEdge 30 Pro offers substantially faster wired and wireless charging.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Razr 40 Ultra edges out the Edge 30 Pro in performance due to its newer Snapdragon processor. While both are powerful, the Razr will handle demanding tasks with slightly more ease.
  • Display: The Razr 40 Ultra's foldable OLED display, with its high refresh rate and exceptional brightness, is a showstopper. The Edge 30 Pro also offers a great display but lacks the “wow” factor of the foldable design. The lack of brightness specs for the Edge makes a true comparison impossible.
  • Camera: While megapixels aren't everything, the Edge 30 Pro's 50MP main camera and 60MP selfie camera significantly outclass the Razr 40 Ultra on paper. However, real-world image quality will depend on factors beyond resolution, such as sensor size and image processing.
  • Battery: The Edge 30 Pro's substantially larger battery and faster charging speeds are clear advantages for power users. The Razr 40 Ultra's smaller battery is a trade-off for its compact foldable design.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Edge 30 Pro: Ideal for users prioritizing performance, battery life, and camera capabilities in a traditional smartphone form factor. Power users, gamers, and photography enthusiasts will appreciate its robust feature set.
  • Razr 40 Ultra: Perfect for users who value cutting-edge technology, portability, and a unique foldable design. Those who prioritize style and compactness over raw power and battery life will find the Razr 40 Ultra compelling.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Is a foldable design a must-have? If yes, the Razr 40 Ultra is your only option here.
  2. How important is battery life and fast charging? If crucial, the Edge 30 Pro is the clear winner.
  3. What's your budget? Foldable phones typically command a premium price.

My Choice: The Motorola Edge 30 Pro

While the Razr 40 Ultra is undeniably cool, I'd personally choose the Motorola Edge 30 Pro. As a power user, the significantly larger battery, faster charging, and superior camera hardware are critical for my workflow. The performance difference between the two phones is negligible for my needs, and I prioritize practicality and all-day battery life over the novelty of a foldable design. While the Razr's external display is intriguing, the significant compromises in battery and camera functionality outweigh the benefits for my usage. I prefer a more traditional smartphone experience with robust features that can keep up with my demanding day.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.