Motorola Edge 30 Neo vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 7, 2022 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 84.91 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 4.05 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 155 g 189 g
Height 152.9 mm 164.1 mm
Width 71.2 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Very Peri
  • Black Onyx
  • Ice Palace
  • Aqua Foam
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.28 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 419 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.93 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.34 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4020 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Edge 30 Neo and the ZTE Blade A75 4G, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer users in the real world.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Edge 30 NeoZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Edge 30 Neo is significantly more compact and pocketable.
Weight (g)155189Edge 30 Neo is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsN/AN/ABuild quality impacts durability and premium feel; information lacking here.
Display
Display TypeP-OLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzEdge 30 Neo offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and smoother scrolling.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612Edge 30 Neo boasts sharper visuals and crisper text.
PPI Density419267Edge 30 Neo delivers noticeably clearer images and text.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5GUnisoc T606 4GEdge 30 Neo provides significantly better performance and 5G connectivity.
CPUOcta-core (2.2 GHz)Octa-core (1.6 GHz)Edge 30 Neo offers faster processing speeds for smoother multitasking and demanding apps.
RAM8GB4GBEdge 30 Neo enables smoother multitasking and handles demanding apps with greater ease.
Camera
Main Camera64MP50MPEdge 30 Neo likely delivers better low-light performance due to a brighter aperture (f/1.8 vs. f/1.8 in some variants, unclear in the provided data for A75 4G) and larger sensor. More details on sensor size and pixel size would be needed for a definitive comparison.
Selfie Camera32MP8MPEdge 30 Neo promises higher-resolution selfies.
Battery Life
Capacity4020 mAh5000 mAhZTE Blade A75 4G likely offers longer battery life, but real-world usage varies.
ChargingN/AN/ACharging speeds are crucial; this information is missing.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Motorola Edge 30 Neo's Snapdragon 695 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G's Unisoc T606. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading, and a more responsive overall experience. The inclusion of 5G in the Edge 30 Neo is a future-proofing advantage.
  • Display: The Edge 30 Neo's 120Hz P-OLED display delivers a vastly superior visual experience compared to the A75 4G's 90Hz IPS LCD. Expect richer colors, deeper blacks, and a smoother, more responsive display on the Edge 30 Neo.
  • Compactness: The Edge 30 Neo is considerably smaller and lighter, making it more comfortable for one-handed use and pocket portability.
  • Battery: While the ZTE Blade A75 4G boasts a larger battery capacity, the Edge 30 Neo’s more efficient processor could potentially offset this difference in real-world usage. Missing charging speed data prevents a complete comparison.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Motorola Edge 30 Neo: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a premium display, a compact form factor, and 5G connectivity. This phone suits those who engage in mobile gaming, multimedia consumption, and demand a smooth, responsive experience.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G: Best suited for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and light media consumption. The larger battery might appeal to users who require extended usage without frequent charging.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Edge 30 Neo sits in a medium price range, while the A75 4G is a low-price option.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Edge 30 Neo is the clear winner. For basic usage, the A75 4G offers adequate performance at a lower price.
  3. Do you value a premium display and compact design? If yes, the Edge 30 Neo's P-OLED and sleek form factor will be highly appealing.

My Choice

I would choose the Motorola Edge 30 Neo. While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers a larger battery and a lower price, the Edge 30 Neo's superior performance, stunning display, and compact design are far more compelling to me. The Snapdragon 695, coupled with the 120Hz P-OLED screen, promises a significantly smoother and more enjoyable user experience. As a tech enthusiast, I prioritize performance and a visually engaging display, making the Edge 30 Neo the clear winner. The addition of 5G ensures the phone remains relevant for longer. While battery life is important, I'm willing to sacrifice some capacity for the overall superior user experience offered by the Edge 30 Neo.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.