Motorola Edge 30 Neo vs Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 7, 2022 May 23, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 84.91 cm³ 98.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 4.05 "/g 3.19 "/g
Weight 155 g 209 g
Height 152.9 mm 160.9 mm
Width 71.2 mm 75 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Very Peri
  • Black Onyx
  • Ice Palace
  • Aqua Foam
  • Black
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.28 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1440 x 3200
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 89 %
Pixel Density 419 PPI 526 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 700 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.93 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.34 mAh/cm³ 50.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4020 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 740

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 15 17

Comparison Summary

Motorola Edge 30 Neo vs. Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive deep into a head-to-head comparison of the Motorola Edge 30 Neo and the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro, dissecting their specs and uncovering what they truly offer in real-world usage.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Edge 30 NeoXiaomi Poco F6 ProReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8160.9 x 75 x 8.2Neo is more compact and pocketable; F6 Pro has a larger footprint.
Weight (g)155209Neo is significantly lighter, reducing hand fatigue.
Display
TypeP-OLED, 120HzAMOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling; AMOLED generally has better contrast.
Size6.28"6.67"F6 Pro provides more screen real estate for media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001440 x 3200F6 Pro boasts sharper visuals due to higher resolution.
Peak BrightnessN/A4000 nitsF6 Pro offers exceptional outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5GSnapdragon 8 Gen 2F6 Pro delivers significantly faster processing and graphics.
CPUOcta-core (2.2 GHz)Octa-core (3.2 GHz)F6 Pro handles demanding tasks and multitasking with ease.
RAM8GB12GB/16GBF6 Pro offers smoother multitasking and app switching.
Camera
Main Camera64MP50MPBoth offer high-resolution sensors; image quality depends on processing.
Ultrawide13MP8MPNeo has a higher resolution ultrawide.
Battery Life
Capacity4020 mAh5000 mAhF6 Pro likely offers longer battery life due to larger capacity.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance Powerhouse: The Poco F6 Pro, with its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, crushes the Edge 30 Neo in raw processing power. This translates to blazing-fast speeds, seamless multitasking, and effortless handling of demanding games. The Edge 30 Neo, while capable for everyday tasks, isn't in the same league.
  • Display Delight: While both phones offer 120Hz refresh rates for butter-smooth scrolling, the F6 Pro's higher resolution AMOLED display delivers a noticeably sharper and more vibrant viewing experience. Its superior peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor readability.
  • Compact vs. Commanding: The Edge 30 Neo is significantly lighter and smaller, making it ideal for one-handed use and pocket portability. The F6 Pro, with its larger display and battery, prioritizes immersive media consumption and longer battery life.
  • Camera Considerations: While megapixel counts differ, real-world image quality will depend heavily on software processing. The Neo boasts a higher-resolution ultrawide lens. We need more data (e.g., DxOMark scores) to make a definitive judgment on camera performance.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Edge 30 Neo: Best suited for users who prioritize a compact and lightweight phone for everyday communication, social media, and light gaming. Its lower price point makes it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers.
  • Poco F6 Pro: Ideal for power users, gamers, and multimedia enthusiasts who demand top-tier performance, a stunning display, and long battery life. The higher RAM options are beneficial for heavy multitasking.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Edge 30 Neo offers excellent value in the mid-range segment, while the F6 Pro commands a higher price for its flagship-level performance.
  2. What is your primary phone usage? Casual users will find the Neo sufficient, while power users will appreciate the F6 Pro's capabilities.
  3. Do you prioritize portability or screen size? The Neo's compact form factor is perfect for on-the-go use, whereas the F6 Pro's larger display enhances media consumption.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro

While I appreciate the Motorola Edge 30 Neo's compact design and affordability, I would personally choose the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro. As a tech enthusiast who often pushes devices to their limits, I value the raw power and future-proofing offered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The superior display and larger battery are also significant factors for my usage patterns, which involve lots of multitasking, media consumption, and on-the-go productivity. I'm willing to pay the premium for a device that can seamlessly handle my workflow and provide a premium user experience. The higher RAM options on the F6 Pro would also be critical for my usage.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.