Motorola Edge 30 Neo vs Realme C67 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C67
Realme C67
Realme

General

Launch Date October 7, 2022 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 84.91 cm³ 99.49 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 4.05 "/g 3.54 "/g
Weight 155 g 190 g
Height 152.9 mm 165.7 mm
Width 71.2 mm 76 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Very Peri
  • Black Onyx
  • Ice Palace
  • Aqua Foam
  • Sunny Oasis
  • Dark Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.28 " 6.72 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 86.6 %
Pixel Density 419 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 550 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 680 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.93 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.34 mAh/cm³ 50.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4020 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

Motorola Edge 30 Neo vs. Realme C67: A Detailed Comparison

Choosing the right smartphone involves understanding how technical specifications translate into real-world performance. Let's dissect the Motorola Edge 30 Neo and Realme C67 to see which device best fits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Edge 30 NeoRealme C67Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8165.7 x 76 x 7.9Neo is more compact and pocketable, C67 is larger.
Weight (g)155190Neo feels lighter in hand, reducing fatigue.
Build MaterialsGlass front, plastic frame, plastic backPlastic back/frameNeo offers a more premium feel with its glass front. C67's plastic build prioritizes durability.
Display
TypeP-OLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 120HzNeo delivers deeper blacks and more vibrant colors, C67 offers potentially better outdoor visibility. Both have smooth scrolling thanks to 120Hz.
Size6.28"6.72"C67 provides a larger viewing area for media consumption, Neo is easier to handle one-handed.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Sharpness is comparable on both.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5GDimensity 6100+Both offer solid mid-range performance, but the 695 5G generally benchmarks slightly higher and has more mature software support.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.7 GHz)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz & 6x2.0 GHz)Comparable multi-core performance, though architectural differences may impact specific tasks.
RAM8GB6GBNeo's larger RAM enables smoother multitasking and app switching.
Storage128GB/256GB128GBNeo offers more storage options for large files and apps.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.8, OIS108MP, f/1.75C67 boasts higher resolution, Neo features Optical Image Stabilization for steadier shots. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing.
Selfie Camera32MP8MPNeo has a significantly higher resolution selfie camera.
Battery Life
Capacity4020 mAh5000 mAhC67's larger battery likely provides longer usage time.
Charging33W wired33W wired (SuperVOOC)Similar charging speeds; specific implementation may result in minor differences.
Other
NFCYesNoNeo supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.
5GYesNoNeo offers future-proofing with 5G connectivity.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: While both chipsets offer decent mid-range performance, the Snapdragon 695 5G in the Neo, coupled with 8GB of RAM, provides a slightly smoother and more responsive experience, especially for demanding tasks.
  • Display: The Neo's P-OLED screen delivers richer colors and deeper blacks, making media consumption more immersive. The C67's IPS LCD might be brighter outdoors. The 120Hz refresh rate on both ensures smooth scrolling.
  • Camera: The C67's 108MP main camera sensor boasts a higher resolution, but megapixels don't tell the whole story. The Neo's Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is crucial for steadier videos and low-light photos. Real-world image quality will depend on the software processing of each phone. The Neo's significantly better selfie camera is a clear advantage for video calls and self-portraits.
  • Battery and Charging: The C67's massive 5000 mAh battery likely translates to significantly longer usage time. Both phones offer comparable fast charging.
  • Connectivity: The Neo's inclusion of NFC is a significant advantage for contactless payments and data transfer. The Neo also offers 5G connectivity for future-proofing.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Motorola Edge 30 Neo: Best suited for users who prioritize a compact, premium design, vibrant display, smooth performance, a good selfie camera, and features like NFC and 5G. This is a great phone for urban dwellers who value portability and modern conveniences.
  • Realme C67: Ideal for users who prioritize long battery life, a large screen for media consumption, and a budget-friendly price point. This is a solid choice for students or anyone who needs a reliable device that can last all day.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • Do you need 5G and NFC? If yes, the Neo is the only option.
  • Is battery life your top priority? If so, the C67's 5000 mAh battery is a compelling reason to choose it.
  • Do you prefer a compact phone with a premium feel? The Neo's slimmer profile and OLED display make it the winner in this category.

My Choice: I would choose the Motorola Edge 30 Neo. While the Realme C67 offers a tempting battery size, I value the Neo's more compact form factor, superior display quality, smoother performance due to the better processor and additional RAM, inclusion of NFC and 5G connectivity, and the much better selfie camera. The slightly higher price is justified for the overall better user experience and feature set that aligns with my needs and preferences. The Neo feels like a more well-rounded device for my daily usage, encompassing both performance and convenience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.