Motorola Edge (2022) vs Samsung Galaxy A14 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 22, 2022 January 12, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 95.51 cm³ 119.03 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.88 "/g 3.27 "/g
Weight 170 g 202 g
Height 160.9 mm 167.7 mm
Width 74.2 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Grey
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Light Green
  • Dark Red

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.1 % 80.2 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.35 mAh/cm³ 42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (6 nm) Exynos 1330 (5 nm) - SM-A146B
CPU Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146B
GPU Arm Mali-G610 MC3 Mali-G68 MP2 - SM-A146B

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13 14

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Motorola Edge (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G. I'll break down the specs, highlight the key differences, and offer practical advice to help you decide which one is the right fit for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Edge (2022)Samsung Galaxy A14 5GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions160.9 x 74.2 x 8 mm167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mmMotorola is more compact and thinner, feels less bulky in hand. Samsung is larger and thicker, may feel heavier and less pocket-friendly.
Weight170g202gMotorola is significantly lighter, more comfortable for extended use. Samsung is noticeably heavier, may cause fatigue.
Display
Size6.6"6.6"Both phones offer the same screen size, ample for most users.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2408Virtually identical sharpness, both offering a crisp visual experience.
TechnologyOLEDPLS LCDMotorola's OLED provides vibrant colors, deep blacks, and better contrast, offering superior visual quality. Samsung's LCD is less vibrant, less contrast and has worse viewing angles.
Refresh Rate144Hz90HzMotorola’s 144Hz offers noticeably smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing overall fluidity. Samsung is adequate for daily use.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsPeak brightness appears identical between the phones.
Performance
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 1050 (6 nm)Exynos 1330 (5 nm)Motorola's MediaTek chipset offers a stronger performance for demanding tasks. Samsung's chip is decent for everyday use, but slower.
AnTuTu Score522,375412,200Motorola has significantly higher benchmark score, suggesting better overall speed.
GPUArm Mali-G610 MC3Mali-G68 MP2Motorola has more powerful graphics, good for gaming. Samsung is less powerful for gaming and demanding graphic processing.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.55"50MP, f/1.8Both offer similar main camera specs on paper but sensor size is different. Motorola is capable of capturing better images in low light.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4513MP, f/2.0Motorola’s selfie camera captures more detail with a higher megapixel count. Samsung's wider aperture is better for low-light shots.
Wide Angle13MP, f/1.5N/AMotorola offers an extra ultrawide camera, more versatile photo angles. Samsung has no ultrawide lens.
Portrait/DepthN/A2MP, f/2.4Samsung has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode. Motorola has no depth sensor.
Macro20MP, f/2.4, 1/2.83"2MP, f/2.4Motorola has a superior macro camera, capturing significantly more detail. Samsung’s macro camera is more basic.
Video4K@30fps with EIS1080p@30fpsMotorola can record videos in 4K, offering higher quality. Samsung only supports up to 1080p.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones have similar battery capacities, should provide similar battery life.
Charging30W Fast Charging, 15W Wireless15W Fast ChargingMotorola charges quicker with wired charging and supports wireless charging, it can also reverse charge other devices.
Software
OSAndroid 12 (max 13)Android 13 (max 14)Samsung has a newer version of Android out of the box, offering the latest features and security updates. Motorola's upgrade path is limited.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5Motorola offers a newer Wi-Fi standard for faster, more reliable connections. Samsung’s Wi-Fi is less future-proof.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.2Bluetooth 5.2Both phones offer same Bluetooth standards. Samsung has additional features.
SIMDual SIM (Nano + eSIM)Dual SIM (Nano + Nano)Motorola supports eSIM which provides more flexibility. Samsung has traditional Dual SIM.
Storage
Internal128 GB or 256 GB64 GB or 128 GBMotorola offers up to 256GB storage, more space for your files. Samsung's maximum storage is only 128GB.
RAM6 GB or 8 GB4 GB or 6 GBMotorola offers more RAM for improved multitasking and smoother performance. Samsung is limited to 6GB RAM.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage, keep this in mind for storage intensive applications and content.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 3 MicsDolby Atmos, Dolby Digital PlusMotorola has better audio quality for media consumption with stereo speakers. Samsung audio quality is more basic.
Security
FingerprintBasic sensorSide-mounted SensorSamsung has a more modern side-mounted fingerprint scanner for easier access. Motorola fingerprint sensor is less advanced.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 3UnknownMotorola has known screen protection. Samsung’s screen protection is unknown.
SensorsBiometric: Fingerprint, Proximity: Proximity, Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Magnetometer, Environmental: BarometerBiometric: Fingerprint, Proximity: Proximity, Motion: Accelerometer, GyroscopeMotorola has more sensors than Samsung.

2. Key Insights

Motorola Edge (2022)

  • Strengths: The Motorola Edge excels in performance, display quality, camera versatility and audio experience. It’s equipped with a smoother 144Hz OLED display, a more powerful chipset, better camera features with higher MP macro camera, and superior audio with stereo speakers. It also charges faster, offers wireless charging, and reverse charging.
  • Competitive Advantages: This phone is better for users who value performance, visual and audio quality, and versatile cameras, along with fast and wireless charging capabilities. The addition of an eSIM enhances its flexibility.
  • Trade-offs: It runs an older version of Android out of the box and the design may be less modern than the Samsung. The fingerprint sensor is also more basic.

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G

  • Strengths: The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G offers a more contemporary side-mounted fingerprint sensor and a newer version of Android out of the box. Its camera and battery are also pretty good for daily use.
  • Competitive Advantages: It's a good budget option for those who want the latest Android version and value a more integrated design with better security.
  • Trade-offs: Its slower chipset, less vibrant LCD screen, less versatile cameras, lack of wireless charging, and less future-proof Wi-Fi are the biggest drawbacks. The lack of expandable storage is another consideration.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Motorola Edge (2022):
    • Ideal User: Gamers, media enthusiasts, photography lovers, power users who multitask, and anyone who values performance, visual quality and faster charging with wireless capabilities. This phone is a must for those who want the best overall daily experience in an affordable price.
    • Use Cases: Gaming, watching high-definition videos, taking diverse photos, and using apps requiring fast and smooth performance.
  • Samsung Galaxy A14 5G:
    • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users, casual smartphone users, those who prefer a side-mounted fingerprint sensor and the newest Android version out of the box.
    • Use Cases: Basic daily tasks, casual social media use, moderate photo taking, and light gaming. This is a great option for older people who want a simple and reliable phone.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three practical questions to ask yourself when choosing between these two phones:

  1. "How important is display and performance?" If you want the most vibrant visuals, fluid animations, and faster overall performance for gaming and multitasking, the Motorola Edge (2022) is the superior choice.
  2. "How important are the latest Android features and an integrated design?" If having the most current Android software and side fingerprint sensor is important to you, the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is better.
  3. "What are my charging habits and how much storage do I need?" If you want faster wired charging, wireless charging, and more storage, the Motorola Edge (2022) is the way to go. Keep in mind that neither phone supports external storage.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • The Performance Enthusiast: Choose the Motorola Edge (2022) for a superior display, faster performance, and more versatile cameras. The 144Hz OLED and more powerful chipset provide a much better experience for gamers and power users.
  • The Budget-Conscious User: Go with the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G for a lower price, latest Android version out of the box, and a convenient side-mounted fingerprint sensor. It meets basic needs well.
  • The Photography Lover: The Motorola Edge (2022) offers superior camera capabilities with its ultrawide lens, superior macro lens and 4k video recording.
  • The User Who Values Audio: The Motorola Edge (2022) with Dolby Atmos, stereo speakers and noise cancellation microphone provides a much better audio experience.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I'd go with the Motorola Edge (2022). The superior display quality, stronger processor, more versatile camera system, better audio with stereo speakers, and fast wired and wireless charging make it a clear winner for me. I also prefer a better quality screen and I tend to do a lot of gaming, so a higher refresh rate is a must. While it might not have the absolute latest Android version out of the box, the performance gains and overall experience make the trade-off worthwhile in my view.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.