Huawei Pura 70 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 6, 2024 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 93.68 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.19 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 207 g 189 g
Height 157.6 mm 164.1 mm
Width 74.3 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Pink
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1256 x 2760 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.5 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 460 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 2500 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.49 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.31 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4900 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Kirin 9000S1 Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU 8 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version 1.2 N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System N/A Android
Initial OS Version N/A 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Huawei Pura 70 vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A Detailed Comparison

The smartphone market is flooded with options, making choosing the right device a daunting task. Today, we'll dissect the Huawei Pura 70 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G, two 2024 releases catering to different segments of the market. By analyzing their specifications and translating them into real-world implications, we'll empower you to make an informed decision.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureHuawei Pura 70ZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions157.6x74.3x8mm164.1x75.8x8.6mmPura 70 is noticeably thinner and potentially more pocketable.
Weight207g189gA75 4G is lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size6.6"6.6"Identical screen sizes offer similar media consumption experiences.
TypeLTPO OLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzPura 70's OLED delivers richer blacks, vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency. 120Hz offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Resolution1256x2760720x1612Pura 70 boasts significantly sharper visuals due to its much higher resolution.
Peak Brightness2500 nitsN/APura 70's exceptional brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetKirin 9000S1Unisoc T606Pura 70's flagship Kirin processor promises significantly faster performance across demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreCore configuration details lacking for both; real-world performance difference likely substantial given chipset disparity.
GPU8Mali-G57 MP1Pura 70's GPU likely offers a major advantage in graphics-intensive applications and gaming.
RAM12GB4GBPura 70's larger RAM enables smoother multitasking and handling of demanding applications.
Storage512GB256GBPura 70 offers double the storage, accommodating more apps, photos, and videos.
Battery
Capacity4900mAh5000mAhA75 4G has a slightly larger battery, but Pura 70's superior power efficiency (OLED, potentially better optimized chipset) might even things out.
Other
OSN/AAndroid 13Missing OS information for Pura 70 hinders a direct comparison.
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments and data transfer.
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 2.0Pura 70's faster USB standard allows for quicker data transfer and potentially faster charging.

2. Key Insights

The Huawei Pura 70 positions itself as a premium device with its cutting-edge display, powerful processor, and ample RAM and storage. Its strengths lie in delivering a high-end user experience, excelling in demanding tasks, gaming, and media consumption.

The ZTE Blade A75 4G, on the other hand, focuses on affordability. Its larger battery and lightweight design are noteworthy, but it compromises on processing power, display quality, and overall performance.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Pura 70: Ideal for power users, gamers, and those who prioritize a premium multimedia experience. Its high price point is justified by its superior performance and features.

A75 4G: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality, long battery life, and lightweight design. It's a good option for light web browsing, social media, and communication.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Pura 70 sits in a higher price bracket, while the A75 4G is a budget-friendly option.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For demanding tasks and entertainment, the Pura 70 is superior. For basic communication and light usage, the A75 4G suffices.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize a stunning display and blazing performance? Choose the Pura 70. Need a long-lasting battery and affordability above all else? Opt for the A75 4G.
Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.