Huawei P60 Pro vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 31, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.55 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.34 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 200 g 189 g
Height 161 mm 164.1 mm
Width 74.5 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Green
  • Violet
  • Rococo Pearl
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1220 x 2700 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.8 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 444 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.23 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.37 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4815 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System N/A Android
Initial OS Version N/A 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureHuawei P60 ProZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161 x 74.5 x 8.3164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6P60 Pro is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)200189Negligible weight difference in real-world usage.
Build MaterialMissingMissingMaterial differences can impact durability and premium feel; information lacking here.
Display
Display TypeLTPO OLEDIPS LCDP60 Pro's OLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency.
Display Size (inches)6.676.6Negligible size difference.
Resolution1220 x 2700720 x 1612P60 Pro has a significantly sharper display with much higher pixel density, resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090P60 Pro's 120Hz display provides smoother animations and scrolling.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4GUnisoc T606P60 Pro boasts a flagship-level processor, significantly outperforming the A75's budget chipset in speed and complex tasks.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)P60 Pro offers substantially better CPU performance for demanding applications and multitasking.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G57 MP1P60 Pro's GPU provides a far superior gaming and graphics rendering experience.
RAM (GB)8/124/8More RAM in certain P60 Pro versions allows for better multitasking and app performance.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850While the A75 has a higher megapixel count, the P60 Pro utilizes a larger sensor (Sony IMX888) and wider aperture (f/1.4), likely resulting in better low-light performance and image quality overall.
Telephoto LensYes (48MP)NoP60 Pro offers optical zoom capabilities, absent in the A75.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@60fps with EIS1080p@30fpsP60 Pro supports higher resolution and frame rate video recording with Electronic Image Stabilization.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)48155000While A75 has slightly larger battery capacity, P60 Pro's superior power efficiency might result in comparable real-world battery life.
Fast Charging88W22.5WP60 Pro offers significantly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Huawei P60 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: Superior chipset, CPU, and GPU deliver a vastly smoother and faster user experience for demanding tasks, multitasking, and gaming.
  • Higher quality display: OLED technology, higher resolution, and faster refresh rate provide vibrant colors, deeper blacks, sharper details, and smoother animations.
  • More versatile camera system: Offers optical zoom, superior low-light performance, and higher quality video recording capabilities.
  • Faster charging: Charges significantly faster with 88W fast charging.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Lower price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Slightly larger battery: Potentially longer battery life for basic usage, though this could be offset by the less efficient processor.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Huawei P60 Pro: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a premium display, excellent camera capabilities, and fast charging. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Best suited for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, web browsing, and social media. Not recommended for demanding applications or heavy usage.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The P60 Pro is a high-end device, while the A75 is a budget phone.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Do you need a powerful phone for demanding tasks, or a simple device for basic communication?
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize features like display quality, camera capabilities, performance, or battery life.

My Choice: Huawei P60 Pro

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers an attractive price point, the Huawei P60 Pro is the clear winner for me. The significantly superior performance, stunning display, versatile camera system, and fast charging outweigh the price difference. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, high-quality visuals, and the ability to capture excellent photos and videos. The P60 Pro delivers on all these fronts. While I acknowledge the price premium, the long-term value and superior user experience justify the investment for my needs. The A75, while suitable for basic usage, would likely become frustrating for my workflow and usage patterns.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.