Huawei nova 11 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 27, 2023 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 96.57 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.61 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 188 g 192 g
Height 164.3 mm 168 mm
Width 74.4 mm 78 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Gold
  • Black
  • White
  • Green
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1200 x 2652 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 91.1 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 429 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 97.89 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.6 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 4G (6 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 670) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System N/A Android
Initial OS Version N/A 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureHuawei nova 11 ProXiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.3 x 74.4 x 7.9168 x 78 x 8.1Poco C65 is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight (g)188192Negligible weight difference.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display TypeOLEDIPS LCDNova 11 Pro offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially brighter colors.
Display Size (inches)6.786.74Virtually identical screen sizes.
Resolution1200 x 2652720 x 1600Nova 11 Pro has a much sharper display, resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090Nova 11 Pro will deliver smoother animations and scrolling.
Pixel Density (PPI)429260Nova 11 Pro's significantly higher PPI translates to sharper details.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 778G 4G (6nm)Helio G85 (12nm)Nova 11 Pro's processor is more powerful and efficient, leading to better performance and potentially longer battery life.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz)Nova 11 Pro offers better multi-core performance for demanding tasks.
GPUAdreno 642LMali-G52 MC2Nova 11 Pro's GPU is significantly more powerful, offering better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM (GB)6/8/124/6/8More RAM options available for Nova 11 Pro, allowing for better multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Similar megapixel count, but image quality depends on sensor and processing.
Front Camera (MP)60 + 88Nova 11 Pro boasts a much higher resolution front camera and a dedicated depth sensor.
Video Recording720p@960fps1080p@30fpsNova 11 Pro can capture super slow-motion video, while Poco C65 is limited to standard 1080p.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)45005000Poco C65 has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life. However, real-world usage will depend on other factors like display and processor efficiency.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare charging speeds.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Huawei nova 11 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: OLED technology with higher resolution, refresh rate, and pixel density delivers a significantly better visual experience.
  • More Powerful Performance: Snapdragon 778G chipset and Adreno 642L GPU offer smoother performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher-Resolution Front Camera: 60MP selfie camera with a dedicated depth sensor allows for high-quality self-portraits.
  • Super Slow-Motion Video: Capable of recording 720p video at 960fps.

Xiaomi Poco C65 Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: 5000 mAh battery potentially provides longer battery life.
  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable than the Nova 11 Pro.

Trade-offs:

  • Nova 11 Pro: Higher price for premium features. Lack of specified OS details raises concerns about software support and app availability.
  • Poco C65: Lower resolution display, less powerful processor, and basic camera features to achieve affordability.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Huawei nova 11 Pro: Ideal for users who prioritize display quality, performance, and camera capabilities. Suitable for photography enthusiasts, mobile gamers, and those who consume multimedia content frequently.

Xiaomi Poco C65: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and basic functionality. A good option for those who primarily use their phone for calling, texting, browsing, and light social media usage.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco C65 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? The Nova 11 Pro excels in multimedia consumption and gaming, while the Poco C65 is sufficient for basic tasks.
  3. How important is display quality and camera performance? The Nova 11 Pro offers a vastly superior experience in these areas.

My Choice: Huawei nova 11 Pro

While the lack of OS details is a concern, the Huawei nova 11 Pro offers a significantly better overall user experience. The superior display, powerful performance, and advanced camera capabilities outweigh the price difference for me. I prioritize a smooth and enjoyable user experience, and the Nova 11 Pro delivers that with its OLED screen, high refresh rate, and capable processor. I am willing to invest more for these premium features. However, if budget is a major constraint and basic functionality is sufficient, the Poco C65 is a viable option. I would strongly recommend researching the current state of Huawei's app ecosystem before committing to the Nova 11 Pro due to the missing OS information.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.