Okay, let's dive deep into a head-to-head comparison of the Huawei Mate 50 Pro and the Motorola Moto E22. I'll break down the specs, analyze the real-world implications, and give you my take on which phone might be the better choice for you.
1. Specifications Breakdown
Feature | Huawei Mate 50 Pro | Motorola Moto E22 | Real-World Implications |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 162.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm | 163.6 x 74.7 x 8 mm | Mate 50 Pro slightly wider and thicker, Moto E22 is taller, not a huge difference |
Weight | 205g | 169g | Mate 50 Pro feels more substantial, Moto E22 is much lighter, better for prolonged use |
Build | Premium Materials | Plastic | Mate 50 Pro has premium feel, Moto E22 is likely more budget focused |
Display | |||
Size | 6.74" | 6.5" | Mate 50 Pro has larger screen for more immersive experience |
Resolution | 1212 x 2616 | 720 x 1600 | Mate 50 Pro sharper, with much more detail and clearer text, Moto E22 is less sharp |
PPI | 428 | 270 | Mate 50 Pro has significantly higher pixel density, leading to a sharper display |
Technology | OLED | IPS LCD | Mate 50 Pro has superior color reproduction, deeper blacks, and higher contrast. Moto E22 screen won't be as vivid. |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz | Mate 50 Pro offers smoother scrolling and animations |
Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both identical in peak brightness at 0 nits |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4nm) | Helio G37 (12nm) | Mate 50 Pro has a much more powerful chip, better for gaming, multitasking, and future-proofing. The Moto E22 will feel slower in all tasks. |
AnTuTu Score | 1,022,043 | 159,800 | Mate 50 Pro is substantially faster, meaning apps will load much quicker and multitasking is seamless |
GPU | Adreno 730 | PowerVR GE8320 | Mate 50 Pro handles graphics much better, with smoother visuals during gaming and other graphics intensive tasks |
Camera | |||
Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.4, 1/1.56" | 16MP, f/2.2 | Mate 50 Pro has a superior main camera with a wider aperture, larger sensor and greater pixel size, resulting in far better images and low light performance. |
Selfie Camera | 13MP, f/2.4 | 5MP, f/2.4 | Mate 50 Pro has higher resolution, capturing more detailed selfies |
Telephoto Lens | 64MP, f/3.5, 1/2" | None | Mate 50 Pro offers versatile zoom capabilities, whereas the Moto E22 has no telephoto zoom |
Wide-Angle Lens | 12MP, f/2.2 | None | Mate 50 Pro can capture wide-angle shots for more creative photos |
Depth Lens | None | 2MP, f/2.4 | Moto E22 allows for portrait mode photos with more depth effect |
Video | Up to 4K@60fps | 1080p@30fps | Mate 50 Pro captures high-quality videos, with 4K option; Moto E22 has simpler video options |
DxOMark Mobile | 149 main / 145 selfie | Not Tested | Mate 50 Pro has a very high DxOMark, showing strong imaging performance |
Features | Wide array of advanced options | basic options | Mate 50 Pro has more camera features like optical zoom, image stabilization, and RAW capture |
Battery Life | |||
Capacity | 4700 mAh | 4020 mAh | Mate 50 Pro has larger battery, offering longer battery life. |
Charging | 66W Fast Charging | 10W Fast Charging | Mate 50 Pro charges much faster, saving you time. |
Features | Wireless & Reverse Charging | None | Mate 50 Pro has advanced battery features like wireless and reverse wireless charging, making it convenient |
Software | |||
OS | (blank) | Android 12 | Moto E22 runs Android 12. Information on the Mate 50 Pro is not provided |
Connectivity | |||
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 | Mate 50 Pro has newer Wi-Fi with faster speeds and more stable connections |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 LE | Mate 50 Pro has a newer Bluetooth version for more efficient pairing and better audio quality |
GPS | Wide Support | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, Galileo | Mate 50 Pro has more supported GPS networks with higher precision |
Storage & RAM | |||
Internal | 256/512GB | 32/64/128GB | Mate 50 Pro has much more storage, great for media and apps |
RAM | 8GB | 2/3/4GB | Mate 50 Pro has more RAM for smoother multitasking and gaming. Moto E22 may struggle with many open applications. |
Expandable | No | No | Neither phone offers expandable storage |
Audio | |||
Audio Quality | Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Moto E22 has a slight edge with Dolby Atmos support, with enhanced spatial sound and clearer audio |
Security | |||
Biometric | Basic fingerprint Sensor | Side Mounted Fingerprint Sensor | Moto E22 has a more advanced side-mounted fingerprint sensor |
Sensors | |||
Sensors | Wide range | Basic range | Mate 50 Pro comes with more additional sensors. |
2. Key Insights
Huawei Mate 50 Pro Strengths:
- Flagship Performance: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset provides top-tier processing power, offering a seamless experience for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications.
- Stunning Display: The OLED panel with high resolution, pixel density, and 120Hz refresh rate makes the Mate 50 Pro the clear winner for media consumption.
- Superior Camera System: The 50MP main sensor, combined with telephoto and wide-angle lenses, delivers exceptional photo and video quality, with advanced features for creative control.
- Fast Charging and Battery: A larger battery and fast charging, coupled with wireless charging options, ensures long-lasting performance and quick refills.
- Premium Build Quality: The use of high-quality materials gives it a premium feel.
Motorola Moto E22 Strengths:
- Lightweight and Compact: Its lighter weight and smaller size make it more comfortable to hold and carry for extended periods.
- Affordable: The Moto E22 is a budget-friendly option, making it accessible to a broader range of users.
- Dolby Atmos Audio: The inclusion of Dolby Atmos gives it a slight edge in audio experience.
- Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor: A more advanced fingerprint sensor.
Trade-offs and Limitations:
- Huawei Mate 50 Pro: Higher price point, no expandable storage, less precise data on the OS.
- Motorola Moto E22: Slower performance, lower resolution display, basic camera capabilities, and less storage/RAM.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
Huawei Mate 50 Pro is best for:
- Power Users: Those who need top-tier performance for gaming, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
- Photography Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize camera quality, creative controls, and versatile shooting modes.
- Media Consumers: People who watch a lot of videos and value screen quality, and want the best viewing experience.
- Tech Lovers: Early adopters looking for advanced technology and a premium experience.
Motorola Moto E22 is best for:
- Budget-Conscious Users: Those who need a functional smartphone without spending a lot.
- Light Users: People who use their phones for basic tasks like browsing, messaging, and calls.
- First-Time Smartphone Owners: Users looking for an affordable, easy-to-use entry point into the smartphone world.
- Users who want a lightweight phone: For users who prefer to carry a very lightweight device.
4. Buying Decision Framework
To help you decide, ask yourself these questions:
- What is your primary use for the phone? (e.g., gaming, photography, casual browsing)
- What is your budget? (high-end vs. budget-friendly)
- How important is high performance, display quality, and camera quality to you?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- If you need a premium experience and prioritize cutting-edge performance and camera quality: Choose the Huawei Mate 50 Pro.
- If you are looking for a basic, budget-friendly phone for everyday tasks: Choose the Motorola Moto E22.
- If you want a lightweight and very affordable device for basic use: The Motorola Moto E22 is your best option.
My Choice
If it were my money, I would choose the Huawei Mate 50 Pro without hesitation. While it's certainly the more expensive option, the sheer leap in performance, the gorgeous display, and the top-tier camera system make it a worthwhile investment for me. As a tech journalist, I regularly use my phone for capturing high-quality photos and videos, running resource-intensive apps, and enjoying media content. The Mate 50 Pro checks all those boxes and would be my workhorse. The Motorola is a great option for those on a budget and would be a decent phone, but it falls too far behind for me.