HTC U23 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 18, 2023 May 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 114.32 cm³ 98.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.19 "/g
Weight 205 g 209 g
Height 166.6 mm 160.9 mm
Width 77.1 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Snow White
  • Coffee Black
  • Black
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1440 x 3200
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.4 % 89 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 526 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 700 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 102.47 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 40.24 mAh/cm³ 50.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4600 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 644 Adreno 740

Connectivity

USB Version 3.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureHTC U23 ProXiaomi Poco F6 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)166.6 x 77.1 x 8.9160.9 x 75 x 8.2Poco F6 Pro is slightly smaller and thinner, potentially improving one-handed usability.
Weight (g)205209Negligible weight difference; both feel substantial in hand.
Display
Size (inches)6.76.67Virtually identical screen sizes.
Resolution1080 x 24001440 x 3200Poco F6 Pro has a significantly sharper display with more detail and clarity.
Panel TypeOLED, 120HzAMOLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, High BrightnessPoco F6 Pro boasts a superior display with richer colors, higher brightness, and HDR support for improved multimedia consumption.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Poco F6 Pro offers significantly faster processing speeds and improved graphics performance, enabling smoother multitasking and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz A710 & 3x2.36 GHz A710 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz X3 & 2x2.8 GHz A715 & 2x2.8 GHz A710 & 3x2.0 GHz A510)The Poco F6 Pro's more powerful CPU architecture translates to noticeable performance gains in demanding applications.
RAM8GB/12GB12GB/16GBPoco F6 Pro offers more RAM in its base configuration, benefiting heavy multitaskers.
Camera
Main Camera108MP50MP (OV50E) with OISWhile the HTC has higher resolution, the Poco F6 Pro's larger sensor, OIS, and advanced features like pixel binning likely result in better image quality, especially in low light.
Video4K@30fps8K@24fpsPoco F6 Pro offers higher resolution video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)46005000Poco F6 Pro has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

HTC U23 Pro Advantages:

  • Potentially more affordable (exact pricing comparison needed).
  • Side-mounted fingerprint sensor, preferred by some users.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly superior performance: Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a considerable advantage in speed and graphics.
  • Much better display: Higher resolution, AMOLED technology, HDR support, and higher brightness deliver a premium visual experience.
  • Larger battery: Likely translates to longer usage time.
  • More advanced camera system: Despite lower megapixel count on the main sensor, superior sensor technology and features on the Poco F6 Pro likely result in better overall image quality.
  • More RAM: Improved multitasking capabilities.
  • More recent Android Version with longer support: Better software features and longer security updates.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The Poco F6 Pro is likely more expensive.
  • Software Experience: While the Poco F6 Pro has a newer Android version, MIUI's customization might not appeal to all users who prefer a cleaner Android experience.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

HTC U23 Pro: Budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability and a clean Android experience. Suitable for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and casual photography.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro: Users who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, and advanced camera features. Ideal for mobile gaming, multimedia consumption, demanding productivity tasks, and photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F6 Pro is positioned in a higher price bracket.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Heavy gamers and multimedia consumers will benefit more from the Poco F6 Pro's performance and display.
  3. How important is camera quality? The Poco F6 Pro likely offers a better overall camera experience.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget: HTC U23 Pro.
  • Power User: Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro.
  • Photography Enthusiast: Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro

While I acknowledge the potential price difference, the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro is the clear winner for me. The significantly superior processor, stunning display with HDR capabilities, larger battery, and advanced camera system offer a vastly improved user experience. The performance gains alone justify the price premium for my usage, which involves demanding tasks, gaming, and multimedia consumption. The longer software support window provided by the newer Android version is also a compelling factor. While I acknowledge some users may prefer a cleaner Android experience and a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, the overall package offered by the Poco F6 Pro is too compelling to ignore.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.