Honor X8b vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Honor X8b
Honor X8b
Honor

General

Launch Date December 22, 2023 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 81.72 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 4.04 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 166 g 222 g
Height 161.1 mm 162.3 mm
Width 74.6 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 6.8 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Titanium Silver
  • Glamorous Green
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.9 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 2000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 55.06 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Honor X8b vs. Samsung Galaxy M35: A Holistic Comparative Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis of the Honor X8b and Samsung Galaxy M35 extends beyond a simple specification comparison. I aim to provide a holistic view, incorporating market trends, technological ecosystems, and future-oriented insights.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping:

FeatureHonor X8bSamsung Galaxy M35Technological ContextInnovation PotentialEcosystem IntegrationPerformance MetricsUser Experience Indicators
Launch Date2023-12-222024-05-24Indicates market timing and potential integration of newer technologies.MediumMediumLowMedium
Display6.7" AMOLED, 90Hz, 2000 nits (peak)6.6" Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM)Display technology and refresh rates are key differentiators in user experience. Higher nits suggest better outdoor visibility.HighHighMediumHigh
Resolution1080x24121080x2340Impacts image sharpness and detail.MediumMediumMediumHigh
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)Chipset dictates processing power, efficiency, and overall performance. 5nm fabrication generally indicates better power efficiency.MediumHighMediumMedium
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz & 4x1.9 GHz)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz)Core architecture and clock speed influence processing capabilities.MediumMediumMediumMedium
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G68 MP5GPU performance is crucial for gaming and graphically demanding tasks.LowMediumMediumMedium
Battery4500 mAh6000 mAhBattery capacity directly impacts usage time.LowLowHighHigh
OSAndroid 13Android 14Newer OS versions generally offer improved features and security updates.MediumHighHighHigh
NFCNoYesNFC enables contactless payments and data transfer.LowHighLowMedium
Video Capabilities1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fpsReflects the device's video recording capabilities.LowMediumHighHigh
Price RangeMediumMediumIndicates target market segment.N/AN/AN/AN/A

2. Strategic Technological Insights:

  • Display Technology: Both devices emphasize display quality, but the Honor X8b boasts a higher peak brightness, potentially offering better outdoor visibility. The Galaxy M35's 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations.
  • Processing Power: While both fall within the mid-range, the Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy M35, built on a 5nm process, is likely more power-efficient. The Mali-G68 MP5 GPU in the M35 also promises better graphics performance.
  • Battery Life: The Galaxy M35's significantly larger battery capacity suggests longer usage time.
  • Operating System: The Galaxy M35 ships with a newer Android version, implying longer software support and potentially more features.
  • Emerging Trends: The inclusion of NFC in the Galaxy M35 aligns with the growing trend of contactless transactions.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment:

  • Honor X8b: Caters to users prioritizing display brightness and a lighter, slimmer design.
  • Samsung Galaxy M35: Appeals to users prioritizing battery life, performance, newer OS features, and NFC functionality. It integrates well within the Samsung ecosystem.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework:

  • 5G Readiness: Neither phone offers 5G connectivity, which is becoming increasingly important for future-proofing.
  • Software Updates: Samsung generally provides longer software updates, making the Galaxy M35 potentially a more sustainable choice.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M35

While the Honor X8b offers an appealing display, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35. Its larger battery, more powerful and efficient processor, newer Android version, NFC capability, and potential for longer software updates make it a more compelling overall package. The superior video recording capabilities are also a significant advantage. Although it lacks the higher peak brightness of the X8b, the trade-offs in battery life, performance, and features favor the M35 for a user seeking a well-rounded device with stronger future-proofing.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.