Honor X8b vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Honor X8b
Honor X8b
Honor

General

Launch Date December 22, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 81.72 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 4.04 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 166 g 209 g
Height 161.1 mm 161.7 mm
Width 74.6 mm 78 mm
Thickness 6.8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Titanium Silver
  • Glamorous Green
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.9 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 2000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 55.06 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Honor X8b vs. Samsung Galaxy A35: A Holistic Comparative Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis of the Honor X8b and Samsung Galaxy A35 extends beyond a simple specification comparison. I aim to provide a holistic understanding of each device within the broader technological landscape, highlighting potential future implications.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping:

FeatureHonor X8bSamsung Galaxy A35Technological ContextStrategic Category
Launch Date2023-12-222024-03-15Indicates market timing and potential access to newer software/hardware advancements.Innovation Potential
Display6.7" AMOLED, 90Hz, 2000 nits (peak)6.6" Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM)Display technology and refresh rates are key differentiators impacting user experience.User Experience Indicators
Resolution1080x2412 (394 ppi)1080x2340 (390 ppi)Higher resolution contributes to sharper visuals but can impact battery life.Performance Metrics
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)Chipset dictates processing power, efficiency, and overall device performance.Performance Metrics
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)CPU architecture influences multitasking capabilities and application responsiveness.Performance Metrics
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G68 MP5GPU performance is crucial for gaming and graphically demanding applications.Performance Metrics
Battery4500 mAh5000 mAhBattery capacity directly impacts device usage time.User Experience Indicators
OSAndroid 13Android 14 (up to 18)OS version and update cycle influence software features, security, and long-term device viability.Ecosystem Integration
NFCNoYesNFC enables contactless payments and data transfer.Ecosystem Integration
Video Capabilities1080p@30fps4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@60fps (EIS)Video recording capabilities cater to content creation needs.User Experience Indicators
Price RangeMediumMediumPrice positioning reflects target market and perceived value proposition.Strategic Category

2. Strategic Technological Insights:

  • Display Technology: While both devices feature AMOLED displays, the Honor X8b boasts a significantly higher peak brightness, potentially offering better outdoor visibility. The Galaxy A35's 120Hz refresh rate provides a smoother user experience.
  • Performance: The Galaxy A35's Exynos 1380 (5nm) processor, built on a smaller process node, theoretically offers better performance and power efficiency compared to the Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm) in the Honor X8b. The Mali-G68 MP5 GPU in the A35 also suggests a stronger graphical performance, supported by its 4K video recording capability.
  • Software and Ecosystem: The Galaxy A35's commitment to longer OS updates (up to Android 18) positions it favorably for long-term usability and security. The inclusion of NFC significantly expands its ecosystem integration for contactless transactions.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment:

  • The Honor X8b caters to users prioritizing display brightness and affordability.
  • The Samsung Galaxy A35 aligns with users who value a smoother display, performance, longer software support, and features like NFC for a more integrated ecosystem experience.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework:

The rapid pace of mobile innovation requires considering long-term implications. The Galaxy A35's commitment to future OS updates, coupled with its more powerful processor and broader ecosystem integration through NFC, suggests a device with greater longevity and adaptability to evolving technological landscapes.

My Choice:

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A35. While the Honor X8b offers an attractive display, the Galaxy A35's superior performance, longer software support, NFC functionality, and overall ecosystem integration provide a more compelling long-term value proposition. These factors align better with my need for a device that remains relevant and performant in the face of rapid technological advancements. The promise of extended software updates ensures continued access to the latest features and security enhancements, making it a more future-proof choice.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.