Honor X7 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Honor X7
Honor X7
Honor

General

Launch Date April 14, 2022 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 111.27 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 198 g 189 g
Height 167.6 mm 164.1 mm
Width 77.2 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ocean Blue
  • Titanium Silver
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.93 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Honor X7 vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive deep into a comparative analysis of the Honor X7 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer in real-world usage.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureHonor X7ZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions167.6 x 77.2 x 8.6 mm164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mmBlade A75 4G is slightly more compact, potentially offering a better one-handed grip.
Weight198g189gThe 9g weight difference might be noticeable during extended use, favoring the Blade A75 4G for comfort.
Display
Size6.74"6.6"Honor X7 provides slightly more screen real estate for media consumption.
Resolution720 x 1600720 x 1612Negligible difference in sharpness; both are adequate for everyday use but not exceptionally crisp.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations, enhancing the user experience.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDExpect similar color accuracy and viewing angles, typical of IPS LCD panels.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680 4G (6nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Snapdragon 680 generally offers better power efficiency and performance compared to the Unisoc T606.
Antutu Score249,000240,000While scores are close, the Snapdragon 680 in the Honor X7 likely handles demanding tasks and gaming slightly better.
RAM4GB/6GB4GB/8GB8GB RAM option in the Blade A75 4G allows for smoother multitasking and better performance with multiple open apps.
Storage128GB128GB/256GBBlade A75 4G offers a 256GB option, crucial for users who need ample storage for media and files.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.850MP, f/1.8While the Blade A75 4G boasts a higher resolution, real-world image quality depends on factors beyond megapixel count.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.08MPExpect similar selfie performance from both devices.
Additional LensesWide, Portrait, MacroNoneHonor X7 offers greater versatility with dedicated lenses for various shooting scenarios.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable endurance.
Charging22.5W22.5WIdentical fast charging speeds should provide relatively quick top-ups.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Honor X7, with its Snapdragon 680, likely holds a performance edge, especially in demanding tasks and gaming, thanks to its more efficient architecture. The Blade A75 4G's 8GB RAM option could provide smoother multitasking.
  • Camera: Honor X7's triple-camera system offers significantly more versatility than the Blade A75 4G's dual camera setup. The wide-angle, portrait, and macro lenses cater to a broader range of photographic needs.
  • Storage: The Blade A75 4G shines with its 256GB storage option, catering to users who store large amounts of data.
  • Software: The ZTE Blade A75 4G ships with a newer Android version (13), potentially offering more features and longer software support compared to the Honor X7's Android 11.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Honor X7: Suited for users who prioritize performance, camera versatility, and a slightly larger display. Mobile gamers and photography enthusiasts would find the X7 more appealing.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G: Best for users who need ample storage (256GB option) and value having the latest Android version. Its slightly more compact design might also appeal to those who prefer a smaller phone.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? This will heavily influence your decision as pricing can vary significantly.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and photography lean towards the Honor X7; large storage needs favor the Blade A75 4G.
  3. How important is software longevity? The Blade A75 4G's newer Android OS might provide longer software updates.

My Choice: The Honor X7

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G boasts newer software and a larger storage option, the Honor X7 is the more compelling device for me. The superior performance of the Snapdragon 680, coupled with the versatility of its triple-camera system, outweighs the benefits of the Blade A75 4G. As someone who values a smooth user experience and enjoys mobile photography, the Honor X7 aligns better with my needs. The slightly larger display is also a plus for media consumption. While I acknowledge the importance of updated software, the performance and camera advantages of the Honor X7 are decisive factors in my choice.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.