Honor Magic5 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 20, 2023 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 94.34 cm³ 103.3 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.81 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 175 g 199 g
Height 161.6 mm 161.3 mm
Width 73.9 mm 78.1 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Emerald Green
  • Titanium Silver
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.9 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.64 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 54.06 mAh/cm³ 48.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5100 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureHonor Magic5 LiteSamsung Galaxy A34Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.6 x 73.9 x 7.9161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2A34 slightly wider and thicker. Magic5 Lite thinner and lighter. Magic5 Lite might feel more comfortable for one-handed use due to narrower width.
Weight (g)175199Noticeable weight difference; Magic5 Lite significantly lighter, reducing hand fatigue.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.676.6Negligible size difference in real-world usage.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness; minimal difference in pixel density.
Display TypeAMOLED, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations due to 120Hz. Super AMOLED on the A34 might offer slightly better contrast and outdoor visibility, but we lack specific nit values for comparison.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5GMediaTek Dimensity 1080Both mid-range chipsets; Dimensity 1080 generally offers slightly better CPU performance, impacting multitasking and demanding apps.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.7 GHz)Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz & 6x2.0 GHz)A34's higher clock speeds suggest better performance in demanding tasks and faster app loading.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G68 MC4Mali-G68 MC4 generally provides a slight edge in graphics performance, potentially beneficial for gaming.
RAM (GB)66Equal RAM capacity; both should handle multitasking similarly.
OSAndroid 12 (up to 13)Android 13 (up to 17)A34 ships with a newer Android version and significantly longer software update commitment, ensuring security and feature updates for a longer period.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)64 MP Main + 5 MP Wide + 2 MP Macro48 MP Main (OIS) + 8 MP Wide + 5 MP MacroA34 boasts Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on its main camera, significantly improving low-light photography and video stability. Honor's higher megapixel count on the main sensor doesn't guarantee better image quality.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA34 capable of recording higher resolution video.
DxOMark Score7492Significantly higher DxOMark score for the A34 suggests better overall camera performance, particularly in photo quality.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)51005000Negligible difference in battery capacity; real-world battery life will depend more on usage patterns and software optimization.
Fast Charging40W25WHonor Magic5 Lite charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Honor Magic5 Lite Advantages:

  • Lighter and Thinner: More comfortable for extended use and one-handed operation.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly reduces downtime.

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Better Performance: More powerful CPU and GPU for smoother multitasking and gaming.
  • Superior Camera: OIS on the main camera and higher DxOMark score indicate significantly better image and video quality, especially in low light.
  • Longer Software Support: Guaranteed updates for a longer period, ensuring security and new features. A crucial factor for long-term use.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Honor Magic5 Lite: Users prioritizing a lightweight, comfortable phone with fast charging and a decent display. Suitable for casual users focused on basic tasks, social media, and web browsing. Budget-conscious buyers who don't heavily rely on the camera.

Samsung Galaxy A34: Users who value performance, camera quality, and long-term software support. Ideal for mobile gaming, photography enthusiasts, and those who want a phone that will last for several years.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is camera quality? If photography is a priority, the A34 is the clear winner.
  2. How long do you plan to keep your phone? The A34's longer software support makes it a better long-term investment.
  3. What's your budget? Consider the price difference between the two models in relation to the features that matter most to you.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A34

While the Honor Magic5 Lite offers a lighter design and faster charging, the Samsung Galaxy A34's superior camera, performance, and significantly longer software support make it the better overall choice for me. The A34's advantages in key areas like performance and camera, combined with the assurance of long-term software updates, outweigh the benefits of a slightly lighter phone. I prioritize a smooth user experience, high-quality photos, and the knowledge that my phone will remain secure and up-to-date for years to come. The investment in the A34 is more future-proof.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.