Honor 50 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 17, 2021 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 102.73 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.47 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 192 g 209 g
Height 161.8 mm 161.7 mm
Width 74.7 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Space Silver
  • Deep Sea Blue
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2376 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.5 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 391 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 96.65 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.86 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4300 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset 8 Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU 8 Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU 8 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Honor 50 Lite vs. Samsung Galaxy A35: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive beyond the spec sheet and explore the Honor 50 Lite and Samsung Galaxy A35 as complete user experiences. We'll uncover how design choices translate into real-world usability for diverse individuals.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureHonor 50 LiteSamsung Galaxy A35User Experience Impact
Interface DesignAndroid 11Android 14The Galaxy A35, with a more recent OS, likely offers a refined interface, potentially with enhanced customization and features. This impacts visual appeal and long-term support.
Display6.67" IPS LCD, 391 ppi6.6" Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 390 ppiThe A35's Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate promises vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling for a more visually engaging and responsive experience.
Interaction Flow--This would require hands-on testing to assess responsiveness and fluidity. However, the A35's faster processor and higher refresh rate suggest a potentially smoother experience.
Accessibility FeaturesFingerprint (side-mounted)Fingerprint (under display)Both offer biometric security. Under-display fingerprint sensors often feel more modern and integrated but personal preference varies.
Design Ergonomics161.8 x 74.7 x 8.5mm, 192g161.7 x 78 x 8.2mm, 209gThe Honor 50 Lite is slightly lighter and narrower, potentially making it more comfortable for one-handed use. The A35 is a bit thinner.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for note-taking during a lecture. The Honor 50 Lite's large 6.67" IPS LCD screen provides ample space to jot down notes, though bright classroom lighting might impact visibility. The A35's Super AMOLED screen, however, excels in bright conditions, offering vibrant clarity and reducing eye strain. Its 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling through documents incredibly smooth, enhancing the note-taking experience.

Scenario: A photographer capturing a quick snapshot. The Honor 50 Lite boasts a 64MP main camera, promising detailed images. However, the A35's camera system, while boasting fewer megapixels, benefits from optical image stabilization (OIS), ensuring sharper photos, especially in low light or when capturing moving subjects. It also offers advanced features like Pro Video Mode, ideal for aspiring content creators.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

For a budget-conscious user: The Honor 50 Lite's lower price point might be more appealing.

For a power user: The Galaxy A35's superior processor, more recent Android version, and 5G connectivity make it better suited for demanding tasks and future-proofing.

For an older adult: The simpler interface of the Honor 50 Lite (depending on the custom UI implementation) might be easier to navigate. Larger text options on both devices are crucial for readability.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Beyond the specs: Choosing between these phones goes beyond raw numbers. It's about understanding how each device caters to individual needs and preferences. The Honor 50 Lite offers a solid foundation, while the Samsung Galaxy A35 provides a more premium, future-proof experience.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35

While the Honor 50 Lite offers value, the Samsung Galaxy A35 resonates more with my user-centric approach. The Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate significantly enhances daily interactions, making everything from scrolling through social media to watching videos incredibly smooth and enjoyable. The more recent Android version ensures longer software support and access to the latest features. The superior camera system, with OIS, caters to the growing need for content creation. Lastly, 5G connectivity future-proofs the device for years to come. Although slightly more expensive, the A35 offers a noticeable uplift in the overall user experience, justifying the price difference. It's a phone designed not just for functionality, but for genuine enjoyment and long-term usability.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.