Google Pixel Fold vs ZTE Blade V60 Design - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2023 June 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 128.59 cm³ 106.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.69 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 283 g 198 g
Height 139.7 mm 164.2 mm
Width 158.7 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 5.8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain
  • Champagne Gold
  • Dark Blue
  • Sunrise Violet

Display

Screen Size 7.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1840 x 2208 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 16:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.7 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 378 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1450 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 83.47 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 37.49 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4821 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G710 MP7 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureGoogle Pixel FoldZTE Blade V60 DesignPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8 (folded)164.2 x 75.3 x 8.6Pixel Fold significantly smaller when folded, easier for pocket portability; Blade V60 Design thinner overall.
Weight (g)283198Pixel Fold noticeably heavier, potentially tiring for extended use; Blade V60 Design more comfortable for one-handed use.
FoldableYesNoPixel Fold offers larger screen real estate in a pocketable size; Blade V60 Design traditional candybar form factor.
Display
Display TypeFoldable OLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzPixel Fold: Superior contrast, deeper blacks, smoother scrolling; Blade V60 Design: Less vibrant colors, potential for motion blur.
Display Size (inches)7.6 (unfolded), 5.8 (folded)6.6Pixel Fold offers a tablet-like experience when unfolded; Blade V60 Design larger than Pixel Fold's outer display.
Resolution (px)2208 x 1840 (unfolded), 1080 x 2092 (folded)720 x 1612Pixel Fold dramatically sharper, crisper text and images on both inner and outer displays; Blade V60 Design noticeably pixelated, especially for media consumption.
PPI378 (unfolded), 406 (folded)267Reinforces the sharpness difference; Pixel Fold significantly clearer and more detailed.
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G2 (5nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Pixel Fold significantly more powerful, enabling demanding tasks and gaming; Blade V60 Design suitable for basic tasks, may struggle with complex apps or multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Pixel Fold's CPU offers superior performance in speed and efficiency.
GPUMali-G710 MP7Mali-G57 MP1Pixel Fold's GPU significantly more powerful for gaming and graphically intensive tasks.
RAM12GB4/6GBPixel Fold allows for seamless multitasking and app switching; Blade V60 Design may experience slowdowns with multiple apps open.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850Pixel Fold leverages Google's computational photography for potentially superior image quality despite lower resolution; Blade V60 Design's actual image quality unknown without testing.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@60fps with HDRUp to 1080p@30fpsPixel Fold capable of significantly higher resolution and frame rate video recording with HDR; Blade V60 Design limited to basic 1080p.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)48215000Despite slightly smaller capacity, Pixel Fold's more efficient processor may result in comparable or better battery life; Real-world usage will vary.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Pixel Fold Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: Superior performance for demanding tasks, multitasking, and gaming.
  • Higher quality display: Foldable OLED with higher resolution, refresh rate, and contrast for a premium visual experience.
  • Superior camera capabilities: Google's computational photography and higher video recording capabilities.
  • Form Factor: Foldable design offering versatility of a large screen in a compact device.

ZTE Blade V60 Design Advantages:

  • Lower price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Lighter weight: More comfortable for extended one-handed use.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life depending on usage patterns.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Pixel Fold: Users who value performance, a premium display, a versatile foldable design, and cutting-edge camera technology. Ideal for power users, content creators, and multitaskers. Price is a secondary concern.

ZTE Blade V60 Design: Budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability and basic functionality. Suitable for calling, texting, web browsing, and light media consumption. Performance and camera quality are less important.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Pixel Fold is significantly more expensive.
  2. What level of performance do you need? The Pixel Fold is far more powerful.
  3. How important is a foldable design? This is a key differentiator.

My Choice: Google Pixel Fold

While the ZTE Blade V60 Design offers excellent value for its price, the Google Pixel Fold's superior performance, stunning display, versatile form factor, and advanced camera capabilities make it the clear winner for me. I prioritize a smooth, powerful user experience and appreciate the flexibility of a foldable device. The higher price is justified by the significant jump in quality and functionality. While the weight might be a concern, the benefits outweigh this drawback for my personal use. I frequently multitask, consume media on the go, and value a high-quality camera. The Pixel Fold caters to these needs better than the Blade V60 Design.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.