Google Pixel 8a vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 14, 2024 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 98.41 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.24 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 188 g 189 g
Height 152.1 mm 164.1 mm
Width 72.7 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain
  • Bay
  • Aloe
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.1 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.2 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 430 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 2000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 120.72 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.64 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4492 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Immortalis-G715s MC10 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 13
Maximum OS Version 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureGoogle Pixel 8aZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions152.1 x 72.7 x 8.9 mm164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mmPixel 8a is noticeably smaller and easier to handle one-handed.
Weight188g189gNegligible weight difference.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display TypeOLED, HDR, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzPixel 8a offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and smoother scrolling thanks to OLED and higher refresh rate. HDR support provides a wider dynamic range for compatible content.
Size6.1"6.6"Blade A75 offers a larger screen for media consumption, but may be less pocketable.
Resolution1080 x 2400 (430 ppi)720 x 1612 (267 ppi)Pixel 8a's significantly higher resolution results in sharper text and images.
Peak Brightness2000 nitsNot specifiedPixel 8a's high peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility. Blade A75's unspecified brightness may be problematic in sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G3 (4nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Tensor G3 offers significantly faster processing, improved AI capabilities, and better power efficiency due to its advanced architecture and smaller process node.
CPUNona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Pixel 8a's CPU is considerably more powerful, enabling smoother multitasking and faster app loading.
GPUImmortalis-G715s MC10Mali-G57 MP1Pixel 8a's GPU provides a far superior gaming experience and handles graphics-intensive tasks more efficiently.
RAM8GB4GBPixel 8a's larger RAM allows for more apps to run in the background without performance degradation.
Storage256GB256GBEqual storage capacity.
Camera
Video CapabilitiesUp to 4K@60fps with OIS1080p@30fpsPixel 8a offers significantly better video recording capabilities with higher resolution, frame rates, and optical image stabilization (OIS) for smoother footage.
Specific Sensor DetailsNot specified for either phoneNot specified for either phoneImage quality comparison is impossible without sensor specifications.
Battery
Capacity4492 mAh5000 mAhBlade A75 has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life. However, real-world battery life depends on various factors, including software optimization and display efficiency.
Charging SpeedNot specified for either phoneNot specified for either phoneCharging speed comparison is impossible without detailed specifications.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Pixel 8a Advantages:

  • Significantly higher performance: The Tensor G3 chip, more RAM, and superior GPU offer a dramatically smoother and faster user experience across all tasks.
  • Superior Display: The OLED display with 120Hz refresh rate and HDR support offers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and smooth scrolling.
  • More compact form factor: Easier for one-handed use.
  • Better Video Recording: Higher resolution and frame rates with OIS.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Larger Battery Capacity: Potentially longer battery life, though real-world usage will vary.
  • Lower Price: Expected given the "low price" designation.
  • Larger Display: More screen real estate for media consumption.

Trade-offs:

  • Pixel 8a: Higher price for premium features.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G: Compromises on performance, display quality, and camera capabilities for a lower price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Pixel 8a: Users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, a compact size, and a smooth user experience. Ideal for demanding tasks, gaming, media consumption, and photography/videography.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality, a large screen, and potentially longer battery life. Suitable for light tasks like web browsing, social media, and calling.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Pixel 8a is a "medium price" phone, while the ZTE Blade A75 4G is "low price."
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Demanding tasks and gaming benefit from the Pixel 8a's performance, while basic usage is well-served by the Blade A75 4G.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize performance, display quality, and camera capabilities with the Pixel 8a, or battery life and affordability with the Blade A75 4G.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy user, gamer, photographer: Pixel 8a is the clear choice.
  • Budget-conscious user with basic needs: ZTE Blade A75 4G offers good value.
  • User seeking a balance between performance and affordability: More research into similarly priced alternatives is recommended, as more context is needed beyond these two options.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.