Google Pixel 8 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 12, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 94.83 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 187 g 189 g
Height 150.5 mm 164.1 mm
Width 70.8 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mint
  • Obsidian
  • Hazel
  • Rose
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.2 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.1 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 428 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1400 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 2000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 119.02 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.24 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4575 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Immortalis-G715s MC10 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 13
Maximum OS Version 21

Comparison Summary

Google Pixel 8 vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A Deep Dive Comparison

Let's dissect the Google Pixel 8 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G, two smartphones targeting different segments of the market. We'll go beyond the spec sheet to understand what these differences truly mean for you, the user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureGoogle Pixel 8ZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions150.5x70.8x8.9mm164.1x75.8x8.6mmPixel 8 is noticeably more compact, easier for one-handed use and pocket portability.
Weight187g189gNegligible weight difference in real-world usage.
Build MaterialsGlass/AluminumPlasticPixel 8 offers a more premium feel and potentially better durability. A75 might feel less premium but could be more resistant to minor drops.
Display
Size6.2"6.6"A75 offers a larger screen for media consumption, but the Pixel 8's size is still ample for most tasks.
TypeOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzPixel 8's OLED delivers richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling thanks to the higher refresh rate. A75's LCD is less vibrant.
Resolution1080x2400720x1612Pixel 8 boasts significantly sharper visuals due to higher resolution and pixel density.
Peak Brightness2000 nitsN/APixel 8's exceptional brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility. Lack of data for A75 suggests a standard brightness level.
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G3Unisoc T606Pixel 8's Tensor G3 offers significantly faster processing, superior AI capabilities, and smoother multitasking compared to the budget T606.
CPUNona-coreOcta-coreCore count is less relevant than architecture. Pixel 8's cores are individually more powerful and efficient.
GPUImmortalis-G715sMali-G57 MP1Pixel 8's GPU provides a substantial advantage in gaming and graphics-intensive tasks. A75 is suited for casual gaming but not demanding titles.
RAM8GB4GBPixel 8's larger RAM enables smoother multitasking and faster app loading. A75 might experience slowdowns with multiple apps open.
Storage256GB256GBBoth offer ample storage, but the Pixel 8's faster storage technology will result in quicker app launches and file transfers.
CameraData not provided for detailed comparison, but Pixel's camera prowess is well established. Expect superior image quality from the Pixel 8.
Battery Life
Capacity4575 mAh5000 mAhWhile the A75 has a larger battery, the Pixel 8's more efficient processor could result in comparable or even better real-world battery life.

2. Key Insights

The Pixel 8 is a clear flagship contender. Its Tensor G3 chip, brilliant OLED display, and refined design place it in a different league. Expect a premium user experience with blazing-fast performance, stunning visuals, and advanced camera capabilities (though detailed camera specs weren't provided).

The ZTE Blade A75 4G, on the other hand, is a budget-oriented device aimed at providing essential smartphone functionality. Its strengths lie in its affordability and large battery. However, performance limitations are expected given the Unisoc T606 processor and lower RAM.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Pixel 8: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a premium experience, a vibrant display, and advanced camera features. Power users, gamers, and content creators will appreciate its capabilities.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Suitable for budget-conscious users who primarily need a device for basic communication, social media, and light web browsing. Its large battery might appeal to users who prioritize long usage times between charges.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Pixel 8 sits in the medium price range while the A75 is a low-price option.
  2. What are your primary smartphone needs? Heavy usage demands the Pixel 8's power. Light usage might find the A75 sufficient.
  3. Do you value a premium experience? The Pixel 8 delivers in build quality, display, and performance. The A75 prioritizes affordability.

My Choice: I would choose the Google Pixel 8. While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers a larger battery and more storage for a lower price, the significantly superior performance, display quality, and overall user experience of the Pixel 8 are far more compelling to me. As a tech enthusiast and someone who values a smooth and responsive device, the compromises on the A75, particularly in processing power and display technology, would be too significant. The Pixel 8's investment in a powerful processor, vibrant OLED display, and advanced software features aligns more closely with my needs and priorities. I am willing to pay more for a device that delivers a truly flagship-level experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.