Google Pixel 7 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 13, 2022 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 99.09 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.2 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 197 g 189 g
Height 155.6 mm 164.1 mm
Width 73.2 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.7 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Obsidian
  • Snow
  • Lemongrass
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.3 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.1 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 416 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.73 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.95 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4355 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G710 MP7 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Google Pixel 7 vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Google Pixel 7 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G, two smartphones targeting different segments of the market. We'll go beyond the spec sheet to uncover what these differences truly mean for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureGoogle Pixel 7ZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)155.6 x 73.2 x 8.7164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Pixel 7 is more compact and pocketable.
Weight (g)197189Negligible difference in weight; both are comfortable to hold.
Build QualityPremium (Glass/Aluminum)PlasticPixel 7 feels more substantial and durable, contributing to a premium experience.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 90HzIPS LCD, 90HzPixel 7 offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better outdoor visibility.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612Pixel 7 has significantly sharper visuals and text. A75's resolution feels dated.
PPI Density416267Pixel 7 displays incredibly crisp details; A75 shows noticeable pixelation.
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G2Unisoc T606Pixel 7 provides vastly superior processing power for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1...)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75...)Pixel 7 handles multitasking and complex apps with ease; A75 may struggle with heavier workloads.
GPUMali-G710 MP7Mali-G57 MP1Pixel 7 offers significantly better graphics performance for smooth gaming and UI transitions.
RAM8GB4/8GBBoth can handle day-to-day tasks, but 8GB on Pixel 7 ensures smoother multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8550MP, f/1.8Pixel 7 leverages superior image processing for significantly better photo and video quality.
Selfie Camera10.8MP8MPPixel 7 likely produces better selfie photos with more detail.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@60fps1080p@30fpsPixel 7 offers higher resolution and frame rate video recording with superior stabilization.
Battery Life
Capacity4355 mAh5000 mAhA75 has a larger battery, but Pixel 7's efficient processor may lead to comparable real-world usage.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance Disparity: The Google Tensor G2 chip in the Pixel 7 significantly outperforms the Unisoc T606 in the A75. This translates to a smoother, more responsive experience across the board, especially in demanding applications and games.
  • Display Quality: The Pixel 7's AMOLED display with a higher resolution and pixel density delivers a vastly superior visual experience compared to the A75's IPS LCD.
  • Camera Prowess: While both phones boast a 50MP main camera, the Pixel 7’s advanced image processing algorithms and computational photography capabilities result in dramatically better photos and videos.
  • Price-to-Performance: The A75 is a budget-friendly option, but the Pixel 7 offers substantially better performance and features for the price difference.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Pixel 7: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a premium user experience, excellent camera quality, and a vibrant display. This phone is suitable for power users, photographers, content creators, and gamers.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G: Best suited for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, web browsing, and social media. This phone is a good option for students, seniors, or anyone looking for a simple, affordable device.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? If you're on a tight budget, the A75 is the more affordable choice. However, if you can stretch your budget, the Pixel 7 offers significantly more value.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the A75 suffices. But for demanding apps, gaming, or content creation, the Pixel 7's superior performance is crucial.
  3. How important is camera quality? The Pixel 7's camera is a clear winner. If capturing high-quality photos and videos is a priority, the Pixel 7 is the better choice.

My Choice: I would choose the Google Pixel 7. While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers a larger battery and a lower price point, the Pixel 7's superior performance, display, camera, and overall user experience are far more compelling. As a tech journalist, I demand a phone that can keep up with my workflow, capture high-quality photos and videos, and offer a smooth, enjoyable user experience. The Pixel 7 delivers on all fronts. The price difference is justified by the substantial leap in quality and capabilities. The A75 feels like a device from a previous generation in comparison.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.