Google Pixel 7 vs Honor Magic V3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 13, 2022 July 19, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 99.09 cm³ 98.98 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.2 "/g 3.5 "/g
Weight 197 g 226 g
Height 155.6 mm 156.6 mm
Width 73.2 mm 145.3 mm
Thickness 8.7 mm 4.35 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Obsidian
  • Snow
  • Lemongrass
  • Red
  • Snow
  • Velvet Black
  • Tundra Green

Display

Screen Size 6.3 " 7.92 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 2156 x 2344
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.1 % 88.6 %
Pixel Density 416 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.73 mAh/in² 82.10 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.95 mAh/cm³ 52.03 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4355 mAh 5150 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G710 MP7 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 3.1
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2 USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Google Pixel 7 vs. Honor Magic V3: A Deep Dive for the Discerning User

The smartphone landscape is constantly evolving, and choosing the right device can feel overwhelming. Today, we'll dissect two compelling contenders: the Google Pixel 7 and the Honor Magic V3. By blending technical expertise with real-world insights, we'll empower you to make a confident decision.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureGoogle Pixel 7Honor Magic V3Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)155.6 x 73.2 x 8.7156.6 x 145.3 x 4.35 (Folded)Pixel 7: Sleek and pocketable. Magic V3: Compact when folded, expansive when unfolded, but potentially bulky.
Weight (g)197226Pixel 7: Noticeably lighter for comfortable one-handed use. Magic V3: Added weight due to the folding mechanism and larger display.
FoldableNoYesMagic V3 offers a larger screen real estate for multitasking and media consumption, but with added complexity and potential fragility.
Display
Size (inches)6.37.92 (Unfolded), ~6.43" (Folded)Pixel 7: Ample for everyday tasks. Magic V3: Tablet-like experience when unfolded, more pocketable when folded.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24002156 x 2344 (Unfolded), 1060x2376 (Folded)Both offer sharp visuals, but the Magic V3 boasts significantly higher resolution when unfolded.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Magic V3 delivers smoother animations and scrolling.
Display TypeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. LTPO on the Magic V3 allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery.
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G2Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Magic V3's newer Snapdragon chip promises superior processing power and graphics performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Magic V3 likely edges out in CPU performance due to newer architecture and higher clock speeds.
RAM8GB12GB/16GBMagic V3 offers more RAM for smoother multitasking and demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable main camera resolution, but sensor and image processing details are crucial for real-world performance.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)43555150Magic V3 packs a larger battery, but the foldable display might consume more power. Real-world usage will determine actual battery life.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Honor Magic V3, powered by the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, will likely outperform the Pixel 7 in benchmarks and demanding tasks. The Pixel 7, however, excels in AI-powered features and computational photography thanks to its Tensor G2 chip.
  • Form Factor: The Magic V3's foldable design is its defining feature, offering a unique blend of portability and expansive screen real estate. The Pixel 7 prioritizes a traditional, sleek, and pocketable form factor.
  • Software Experience: Pixel 7 offers a pure Android experience with guaranteed timely updates, while the Magic V3 will have Honor's custom skin on top of Android.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Pixel 7: Ideal for users who prioritize a clean Android experience, a compact and lightweight design, and excellent camera performance in a more affordable package. Best for everyday users, photographers, and those seeking a seamless software experience.
  • Magic V3: Suited for power users, multitaskers, and content consumers who crave a larger display for productivity and entertainment. The foldable design caters to those seeking a cutting-edge device that pushes the boundaries of mobile technology.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Pixel 7 falls in the medium price range, while the Magic V3 is a high-end flagship.
  2. Do you prioritize portability or screen real estate? The Pixel 7 is more pocketable, while the Magic V3 offers a larger unfolded display.
  3. What kind of software experience do you prefer? Pixel 7 offers pure Android, while the Magic V3 has a customized Android skin.

My Choice: As a tech journalist who values a balance of performance, portability, and a clean software experience, I would personally choose the Google Pixel 7. While the Honor Magic V3 is undeniably innovative, the Pixel 7's combination of a refined design, excellent camera, pure Android, and more accessible price point aligns better with my needs and priorities. The Tensor G2 chip, although not as powerful as the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in raw performance, offers unique AI capabilities that enhance daily use in ways that benchmark numbers don't fully capture. Furthermore, the significantly lower price of the Pixel 7 makes it a compelling value proposition. While I appreciate the advancements in foldable technology, I'm not yet convinced that the trade-offs in bulk, weight, and price are justified for my personal use case.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.