Google Pixel 7 Pro vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 13, 2022 September 20, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 111.06 cm³ 88.78 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.17 "/g
Weight 212 g 199 g
Height 162.9 mm 149.6 mm
Width 76.6 mm 71.5 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Obsidian
  • Snow
  • Hazel
  • Black Titanium
  • White Titanium
  • Natural Titanium
  • Desert Titanium

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.3 "
Resolution 1440 x 3120 1206 x 2622
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.3 % 90.9 %
Pixel Density 512 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 2000 nits
Peak Brightness 1500 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 90.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.02 mAh/cm³ 40.35 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3582 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) Apple A18 Pro (3 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Hexa-core (2x4.05 GHz + 4x2.42 GHz)
GPU Mali-G710 MP7 Apple GPU (6-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 3.2
OTG Support
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2 USB Type-C 3.2, Gen 2, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 13 18
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Google Pixel 7 Pro vs. Apple iPhone 16 Pro: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Google Pixel 7 Pro and the Apple iPhone 16 Pro, going beyond the spec sheet to understand what these phones offer in the real world.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureGoogle Pixel 7 ProApple iPhone 16 ProReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9149.6 x 71.5 x 8.3iPhone 16 Pro is noticeably smaller and lighter, enhancing one-handed usability.
Weight (g)212199Lighter iPhone contributes to reduced fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.76.3Pixel offers a larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1440 x 31201206 x 2622Pixel boasts a sharper display with higher pixel density, resulting in crisper text and images.
TypeLTPO AMOLEDLTPO Super Retina XDR OLEDBoth use power-efficient LTPO panels enabling dynamic refresh rates for smoother scrolling and extended battery life.
Peak Brightness(nits)15002000iPhone 16 Pro's higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G2Apple A18 ProA18 Pro, being newer, likely offers a significant performance advantage in benchmarks and demanding tasks.
RAM (GB)128Pixel's higher RAM could contribute to better multitasking and app retention in the background.
OSAndroid 13iOS 18OS preference is subjective, impacting app ecosystem, customization options, and privacy features.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5048Megapixel count doesn't tell the whole story; image processing and sensor quality are crucial.
Telephoto (x)5x Optical5x OpticalComparable optical zoom capabilities.
Video4K@60fps4K@120fpsiPhone 16 Pro supports higher frame rate video recording for smoother slow-motion footage.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50003582Pixel's significantly larger battery likely translates to longer usage time.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: While the Tensor G2 is no slouch, the A18 Pro, built on a more advanced 3nm process, will likely deliver superior raw performance and efficiency.
  • Display: Both phones offer stunning displays. The Pixel packs more pixels, while the iPhone 16 Pro boasts a brighter screen for improved outdoor visibility.
  • Camera: Both are top-tier camera systems. Real-world image quality will depend heavily on computational photography prowess. Expect the iPhone to excel in video recording due to its higher frame rate capabilities.
  • Battery Life: The Pixel's larger battery capacity suggests a longer lasting battery, a crucial factor for power users.
  • Software: The biggest differentiator is the operating system. Android offers greater customization and flexibility, while iOS prioritizes ease of use and a tightly controlled ecosystem.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Pixel 7 Pro: Ideal for Android enthusiasts, power users demanding long battery life, and those who prioritize a large, high-resolution display. Its superior value proposition makes it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers.
  • iPhone 16 Pro: Best suited for users entrenched in the Apple ecosystem, those seeking top-tier performance, and those who prioritize a premium, compact design. The enhanced video recording capabilities will appeal to content creators.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Which operating system do you prefer? This is often the most significant deciding factor.
  2. What's your budget? The Pixel 7 Pro offers flagship features at a more accessible price point.
  3. What are your priorities? Battery life, performance, camera features, and display quality – rank these in order of importance.

My Choice:

If I were choosing between these two, I would opt for the Pixel 7 Pro. While I appreciate the likely performance gains of the A18 Pro chip, the Pixel's combination of a larger, sharper display, significantly larger battery, and more compelling price makes it the more attractive option for me personally. Android's open ecosystem and customization options also align better with my preferences. The Pixel's strong camera performance, especially its computational photography capabilities, further solidifies my choice. While the iPhone 16 Pro is undoubtedly a powerful device, the Pixel 7 Pro offers a more well-rounded package that better suits my needs and priorities. The difference in price also allows for investment in other tech gadgets or experiences, which enhances the overall value proposition.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.