Google Pixel 6 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 28, 2021 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 105.58 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.09 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 207 g 184.5 g
Height 158.6 mm 170.8 mm
Width 74.8 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Sorta Seafoam
  • Kinda Coral
  • Stormy Black
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.4 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.65 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.7 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4614 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Google Tensor (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G78 MP20 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 14 16

Comparison Summary

The Pixel 6 vs. The Razr 40 Ultra: A Tale of Two Experiences

As a technology communications specialist, my aim isn't just to compare specs, but to paint a picture of how these devices fit into your life. The Google Pixel 6 and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra represent distinct design philosophies, each catering to a different user narrative. Let's dive into a user-centered analysis:

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureGoogle Pixel 6Motorola Razr 40 UltraUser Experience Impact
Form FactorTraditional SlabFoldable clamshellRazr offers portability and nostalgia; Pixel prioritizes screen real estate in a familiar format.
Interface DesignClean, minimalist Android with Google's flavorMotorola's My UX skin over AndroidPixel offers a pure Android experience; Razr adds customization options, potentially impacting simplicity.
Interaction FlowSmooth, intuitive, focused on core functionalitySplit-screen capabilities on folding displayRazr allows for unique multitasking; Pixel focuses on a streamlined single-screen experience.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility featuresFoldable design may present physical challengesPixel's traditional design generally offers broader physical accessibility; Razr's external display enhances quick interactions.
ErgonomicsComfortable to hold, though largeCompact when folded, potentially less ergonomic when openPixel prioritizes single-hand usability when open; Razr prioritizes pocketability but may compromise extended single-hand use when open.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Pixel 6: The Reliable Companion: Imagine a device that seamlessly integrates into your daily routine. The Pixel 6, with its clean Android experience and Tensor chip, prioritizes performance and simplicity. Its camera, renowned for its computational photography, effortlessly captures stunning photos, even in challenging conditions. This is a phone for those who value a smooth, predictable, and reliable technological partner.

Razr 40 Ultra: The Statement Piece: Picture yourself pulling out a sleek, compact device that unfolds to reveal a vibrant full-screen experience. The Razr 40 Ultra is a conversation starter, a blend of nostalgia and cutting-edge technology. Its foldable design allows for unique interactions, like using the external display for quick replies or selfies. This phone is for those who embrace innovation and desire a device that reflects their personal style.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

Both devices offer standard Android accessibility features. However, the Razr's foldable design might pose challenges for users with limited dexterity. The Pixel 6's larger, single screen may be preferable for users who require larger text or icons. Conversely, the Razr's external display can be beneficial for quick interactions without fully opening the device, potentially aiding some users.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

The choice boils down to your individual priorities:

  • Prioritize Simplicity and Functionality: Pixel 6
  • Prioritize Innovation and Portability: Razr 40 Ultra

My Choice: The Google Pixel 6

While the Razr 40 Ultra is undeniably innovative and stylish, I value the Pixel 6's focus on core functionality and user experience. Its clean Android interface, powerful performance, and exceptional camera align with my need for a reliable and intuitive device. The Razr's foldable design, while intriguing, introduces complexities in terms of usability and durability that don't outweigh its benefits for my personal needs. I appreciate a seamless, predictable digital experience, and the Pixel 6 delivers precisely that.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.