Google Pixel 6 vs Motorola Razr 40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date October 28, 2021 June 21, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 105.58 cm³ 93.53 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.09 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 207 g 188.6 g
Height 158.6 mm 170.8 mm
Width 74.8 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Sorta Seafoam
  • Kinda Coral
  • Stormy Black
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.4 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.65 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.7 mAh/cm³ 44.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4614 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Google Tensor (5 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G78 MP20 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 14 16

Comparison Summary

The Pixel 6 vs. The Razr 40: A Tale of Two Experiences

Let's dive into the world of mobile devices, not through a lens of gigahertz and megapixels, but through the stories they tell about their users and their design philosophies. We're comparing the Google Pixel 6, a champion of practical innovation, and the Motorola Razr 40, a modern flip phone with a nostalgic twist.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeaturePixel 6Razr 40User Experience Impact
Interface DesignClean, minimalist Android with Google's signature design language.Android with Motorola's customizations, likely including gesture support for the foldable screen.Pixel 6 offers a pure Android experience, while the Razr 40 might include extra features tailored to the folding mechanism.
Interaction FlowTraditional smartphone interaction with a focus on software fluidity.Dual-screen experience; a main screen and a smaller external display for quick interactions. Folding action adds a tactile dimension.Razr 40's unique interaction flow, driven by its form factor, introduces a learning curve but also potentially faster access to certain tasks.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility features.Likely includes features specific to one-handed use due to its compact folded size. External display might offer accessibility shortcuts.Razr 40's foldable design might be advantageous for users with smaller hands or those who prefer one-handed operation.
Design ErgonomicsStandard slab phone ergonomics. Can be unwieldy for some users due to size.Compact when folded, fitting comfortably in pockets. Open, it offers a large screen experience.Razr 40's portability and foldability offer a distinct ergonomic advantage for carrying and discreet checking.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

The Pixel 6: The Reliable Companion: Imagine a busy professional, juggling emails, calls, and quick photo captures throughout their day. The Pixel 6, with its powerful Tensor chip and refined camera, seamlessly handles these tasks. Its clean Android interface allows for intuitive navigation, minimizing distractions and maximizing efficiency.

The Razr 40: The Modern Statement: Picture a trendsetter, someone who values style and portability. The Razr 40, with its sleek foldable design, allows them to make a statement. The satisfying snap of the phone closing offers a sense of closure and a break from constant digital connection. The external display provides quick access to notifications and essential functions without unfolding the device.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

Both devices cater to different user groups. The Pixel 6, with its straightforward functionality, is ideal for users who prioritize a seamless and reliable smartphone experience. The Razr 40, on the other hand, appeals to users who value portability, unique design, and a touch of nostalgia, potentially sacrificing some usability for the sake of form. Users with accessibility needs related to one-handed use or tactile feedback might find the Razr 40 particularly appealing.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Choosing between these devices hinges on prioritizing design philosophy. Do you value a pure, powerful, and practical smartphone experience? The Pixel 6 is your answer. Do you crave a compact, stylish device that sparks conversation and offers a different way to interact with your phone? The Razr 40 is the more daring choice.

My Choice: The Google Pixel 6

While I appreciate the innovative design of the Razr 40, I would choose the Google Pixel 6. My priorities lie in a smooth, uncluttered software experience, reliable performance, and a strong camera. The Pixel 6's clean Android interface and powerful Tensor chip align perfectly with my need for a device that seamlessly integrates into my workflow without unnecessary distractions. Although the Razr 40 offers a unique form factor, I find the potential usability trade-offs and the added complexity of the folding mechanism less appealing for my personal needs. I value the dependable and intuitive experience offered by the Pixel 6, making it the more suitable choice for my usage patterns and preferences.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.