Google Pixel 6 vs Huawei Mate X3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 28, 2021 April 8, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 105.58 cm³ 117.67 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.09 "/g 3.28 "/g
Weight 207 g 239 g
Height 158.6 mm 156.9 mm
Width 74.8 mm 141.5 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 5.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Sorta Seafoam
  • Kinda Coral
  • Stormy Black
  • Gold
  • Black
  • White
  • Violet
  • Dark Green

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 7.85 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 2224 x 2496
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.4 % 88.9 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 426 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.65 mAh/in² 77.89 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.7 mAh/cm³ 40.79 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4614 mAh 4800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Google Tensor (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G78 MP20 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 3.1
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A 1.2
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1 USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2

Software

Operating System Android N/A
Initial OS Version 12 N/A
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

The Pixel 6 vs. the Mate X3: A Tale of Two Experiences

Let's embark on a journey beyond the gigabytes and megapixels, diving into the heart of what makes the Google Pixel 6 and the Huawei Mate X3 distinct user experiences. We'll use a narrative approach to understand how these devices cater to different needs and preferences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureGoogle Pixel 6Huawei Mate X3User Experience Impact
Interface DesignClean, minimalist Android with Google's signature designElegant, potentially featuring HarmonyOSImpacts visual appeal, intuitiveness, and overall aesthetic satisfaction.
Interaction FlowSmooth, intuitive thanks to stock Android and 90Hz refresh ratePotentially seamless, enhanced by 120Hz and foldable designDetermines ease of navigation, task completion efficiency, and overall user flow.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility featuresDependent on OS; potentially limited due to US restrictionsAffects usability for users with diverse needs and abilities.
Design ErgonomicsComfortable one-handed use for most; noticeable camera bumpFoldable design offers versatility but might be bulky when foldedImpacts comfort during prolonged use, portability, and one-handed operability.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional constantly on the go. The Pixel 6, with its clean interface and smooth performance, allows for effortless multitasking between emails, presentations, and capturing quick snapshots with its impressive camera. Its user-friendly design requires minimal learning curve, ensuring a seamless transition for users familiar with Android.

Now picture a creative individual who values versatility and portability. The Mate X3's foldable design transforms from a phone to a tablet, offering an expansive screen for sketching, editing photos, or enjoying immersive media consumption. The increased screen real estate enhances productivity and entertainment on the go. However, the potential lack of Google services due to restrictions could hinder access to familiar apps.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

The Pixel 6 caters well to users seeking a reliable, user-friendly smartphone with a strong focus on photography and a pure Android experience. Its intuitive interface and widespread app availability make it accessible to a broad audience.

The Mate X3, with its foldable design and high-end specifications, targets users who prioritize innovation and are willing to embrace new form factors. However, its higher price point and potential software limitations might make it less accessible to some.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing between these devices depends on your individual priorities:

  • Prioritize Simplicity and Affordability: Pixel 6
  • Prioritize Innovation and Versatility: Mate X3

My Choice: The Google Pixel 6

As a technology communications specialist focused on user-centered design, I would choose the Google Pixel 6. While the Mate X3's foldable technology is undeniably intriguing, the Pixel 6's commitment to a clean, intuitive user experience resonates more strongly with my core values. Its seamless integration of hardware and software, coupled with its affordability and broader accessibility, makes it a compelling choice for a wider audience.

The potential limitations on the Mate X3 due to software restrictions, along with its significantly higher price, make the Pixel 6 a more practical and user-friendly option for me. I value the Pixel's consistent performance, excellent camera capabilities, and commitment to providing a smooth, accessible user experience. Its straightforward design philosophy aligns perfectly with my mission to demystify technology and make it enjoyable for everyone.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.