Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 14C - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 18, 2024 August 30, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 111.96 cm³ 109.67 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.01 "/g 3.26 "/g
Weight 225 g 211 g
Height 163.8 mm 171.9 mm
Width 76.8 mm 77.8 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Phantom Black
  • Midnight Black
  • Starry Blue
  • Sage Green
  • Dreamy Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.88 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.2 % 84 %
Pixel Density 388 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness 1600 nits 600 nits
Peak Brightness 2500 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 119.65 mAh/in² 109.01 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.12 mAh/cm³ 47.05 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5500 mAh 5160 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
CPU Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 750 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version 1.4 N/A
USB Features USB Type-C, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4, Bottom Port USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureAsus ROG Phone 8 ProXiaomi Redmi 14CPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.8 x 76.8 x 8.9171.9 x 77.8 x 8.2Redmi 14C is slightly larger and thinner. ROG Phone 8 Pro feels more premium due to smaller bezels.
Weight (g)225211ROG Phone 8 Pro is noticeably heavier, potentially impacting one-handed use.
Build MaterialsMissingMissingBuild quality and durability cannot be assessed without this information.
Display
Display TypeLTPO AMOLEDIPS LCDROG Phone 8 Pro offers significantly better contrast, color accuracy, and viewing angles due to AMOLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.786.88Redmi 14C has a slightly larger display, but the difference is negligible.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1640ROG Phone 8 Pro has a much sharper display (388 ppi vs 260 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)165120ROG Phone 8 Pro provides a smoother and more responsive user experience, especially noticeable in gaming and scrolling.
Peak Brightness (nits)2500600 (HBM)ROG Phone 8 Pro offers exceptional outdoor visibility, even in direct sunlight. Redmi 14C's peak brightness is significantly lower.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 3MediaTek Helio G81 UltraROG Phone 8 Pro offers vastly superior processing power, enabling demanding gaming and multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)The ROG Phone 8 Pro's CPU architecture is significantly more powerful and efficient.
GPUAdreno 750Mali-G52 MC2ROG Phone 8 Pro offers a much more powerful GPU for high-end gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM24GB6GB/8GBROG Phone 8 Pro has significantly more RAM, allowing for seamless multitasking and keeping more apps open in the background.
Storage1000GB128GBROG Phone 8 Pro provides significantly more storage.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)55005160Similar battery capacities, though real-world battery life depends on optimization and usage.
Charging SpeedMissingMissingCharging speed comparison is impossible without this information.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: Superior chipset, CPU, GPU, and RAM for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Superior display: AMOLED technology, higher resolution, refresh rate, and peak brightness.
  • More storage: 1TB offers ample space for apps, media, and files.

Xiaomi Redmi 14C Advantages:

  • Lighter and Slightly Thinner: Potentially more comfortable for extended use and pocket portability.
  • Potentially Lower Price: While both are in the "medium price" range, the Redmi 14C is likely more affordable.
  • More Color Options: Offers more aesthetic choices.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro: Ideal for power users, gamers, and content creators who demand top-tier performance, a stunning display, and ample storage.

Xiaomi Redmi 14C: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality, casual gaming, and social media consumption.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The ROG Phone 8 Pro will likely be significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Demanding games and multitasking benefit from the ROG Phone 8 Pro's power.
  3. What display quality do you require? The ROG Phone 8 Pro's AMOLED display offers a vastly superior visual experience.

My Choice: Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro

While significantly more expensive, the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is the clear winner for me. Its superior performance, stunning display, and ample storage cater to my needs as a power user who values a smooth and responsive experience. The 165Hz refresh rate and AMOLED display are major selling points for me, as I appreciate smooth scrolling and vibrant visuals. While the Redmi 14C offers a larger battery and lighter weight, these advantages are outweighed by the significant performance gap and inferior display. I prioritize long-term performance and user experience over minor differences in battery life and weight. The massive storage on the ROG Phone 8 Pro also eliminates concerns about running out of space for apps and media.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.