Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date January 18, 2024 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 111.96 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.01 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 225 g 185 g
Height 163.8 mm 164.6 mm
Width 76.8 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Phantom Black
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.2 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 388 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness 1600 nits 625 nits
Peak Brightness 2500 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 119.65 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.12 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 750 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version 1.4 N/A
USB Features USB Type-C, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4, Bottom Port USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureAsus ROG Phone 8 ProRealme C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.8 x 76.8 x 8.9 mm164.6 x 76.1 x 7.6 mmRealme C65 is slightly thinner and lighter.
Weight225g185gRealme C65 is noticeably lighter for extended use.
Fingerprint SensorUnder displaySide-mountedPersonal preference, but under-display is often perceived as more premium.
Display
Display TypeLTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 165HzIPS LCD, 90HzROG Phone 8 Pro offers significantly better color accuracy, contrast, and smoother animations due to AMOLED and higher refresh rate.
Display Size6.78"6.67"Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1600ROG Phone 8 Pro has a much sharper display.
Peak Brightness2500 nits625 nits (HBM)ROG Phone 8 Pro will be far more visible in direct sunlight.
Refresh Rate165Hz90HzROG Phone 8 Pro offers a significantly smoother and more responsive experience, especially in gaming.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm)ROG Phone 8 Pro offers vastly superior performance in all tasks, including demanding games and multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)ROG Phone 8 Pro's CPU is significantly more powerful.
GPUAdreno 750Mali-G52 MC2ROG Phone 8 Pro offers drastically better graphics performance for gaming.
RAM/Storage24GB/1000GB8GB/128GBROG Phone 8 Pro provides significantly more RAM and storage for smoother multitasking and ample space for files.
Battery
Capacity5500 mAh5000 mAhSlightly larger battery in the ROG Phone 8 Pro, but real-world battery life depends on usage.
Camera
Video Capabilities8K@24fps, 4K@60fps, ...1080p@30fpsROG Phone 8 Pro offers far superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution and frame rates. Detailed camera specifications are missing for both phones, limiting a comprehensive comparison.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Advantages:

  • Flagship Performance: Significantly more powerful processor, GPU, and RAM for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Superior Display: AMOLED with higher resolution, refresh rate, and peak brightness for a vibrant and smooth visual experience.
  • Advanced Features: DisplayPort, more versatile USB options.
  • More Storage: Ample storage for apps, games, and media.

Realme C65 Advantages:

  • Lighter and Thinner: More comfortable for one-handed use and carrying.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Although both are mid-range, the Realme C65 likely costs less.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

ROG Phone 8 Pro: Ideal for mobile gamers, power users, and those who prioritize performance and a premium display. Excellent for demanding tasks, content creation, and media consumption.

Realme C65: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality, lightweight design, and long battery life. Best for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and communication.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The ROG Phone 8 Pro will likely be significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and demanding tasks favor the ROG Phone 8 Pro, while basic usage favors the Realme C65.
  3. Do you prioritize performance or portability? The ROG Phone 8 Pro prioritizes performance, while the Realme C65 is lighter and more portable.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: ROG Phone 8 Pro is the clear choice.
  • Casual User: Realme C65 is a sufficient and more affordable option.
  • Power User: ROG Phone 8 Pro for its superior performance and multitasking capabilities.

My Choice: Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro

While significantly more expensive, the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro offers a vastly superior user experience across the board. The combination of a top-tier processor, stunning display, ample RAM and storage, and advanced features like DisplayPort makes it a clear winner for my needs. I prioritize performance, a smooth and vibrant display, and future-proofing my device. The Realme C65, while adequate for basic tasks, simply cannot compete with the overall package offered by the ROG Phone 8 Pro. The significant difference in performance and display quality justifies the higher price for my usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.