Asus ROG Phone 7 vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date May 1, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 137.21 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.84 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 239 g 188.4 g
Height 173 mm 171.3 mm
Width 77 mm 74 mm
Thickness 10.3 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Phantom Black
  • Storm White
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2448 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.2 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1500 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 130.52 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.73 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 740 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version 1.4 N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4, Accessory Connector USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureAsus ROG Phone 7Motorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)173 x 77 x 10.3171.3 x 74 x 7.3Razr 50 significantly thinner and slightly smaller due to foldable design. ROG Phone 7 larger and heavier, impacting portability.
Weight (g)239188.4Razr 50 noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use and pocket comfort.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50 offers compact portability when folded, but introduces potential durability concerns.
Display
Size (inches)6.786.9Similar screen real estate, but Razr 50's foldable design changes usability.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24481080 x 2640Comparable sharpness; Razr 50 slightly taller due to aspect ratio.
Refresh Rate (Hz)165120ROG Phone 7 provides smoother animations and scrolling. Razr 50 still smooth, but less so.
Display TypeAMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Razr 50's LTPO panel potentially offers better power efficiency, but specific implementation details are missing.
Peak Brightness (nits)15003000Razr 50 significantly brighter, enhancing outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2Dimensity 7300XROG Phone 7 boasts a flagship chipset, delivering significantly higher performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)ROG Phone 7's CPU architecture provides a substantial performance advantage for multitasking and heavy applications.
GPUAdreno 740Mali-G615 MC2ROG Phone 7 has a much more powerful GPU, crucial for high-end gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM (GB)12/168/12ROG Phone 7 offers more RAM in certain configurations, further enhancing multitasking and performance.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)50 (Sony IMX766)50Both have 50MP main sensors, but ROG Phone 7 specifies a higher-quality Sony IMX766 sensor, likely resulting in better image quality. Razr sensor details are lacking.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 4K@30fpsROG Phone 7 capable of higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)60004200ROG Phone 7 has significantly larger battery capacity, likely translating to longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Asus ROG Phone 7 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly more powerful CPU and GPU for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother visuals for gaming and everyday use.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially much longer battery life.
  • Higher Resolution Video Recording: Captures more detail in videos.
  • Likely Superior Main Camera: Utilizes a known high-quality sensor.

Motorola Razr 50 Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers unique portability and a smaller footprint when folded.
  • Brighter Display: Better visibility in direct sunlight.
  • Lower Price: More budget-friendly option.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr 50: Sacrifices performance and battery life for foldability and a lower price.
  • ROG Phone 7: Larger and heavier, less pocketable.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Asus ROG Phone 7: Ideal for mobile gamers, power users, and those who prioritize performance and battery life. Excels in demanding tasks, gaming, and extended use without recharging.

Motorola Razr 50: Suitable for users who value portability and style above raw performance. Best for those who want a compact phone and prioritize unique design and affordability.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The ROG Phone 7 is significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and heavy multitasking favor the ROG Phone 7, while portability and style favor the Razr 50.
  3. How important is battery life? The ROG Phone 7 likely offers significantly longer battery life.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: ROG Phone 7
  • Business Professional: Either, depending on portability vs. performance needs. Razr 50 for ultimate portability, ROG Phone 7 for longer battery life and handling demanding tasks.
  • Casual User: Razr 50 if budget is a concern; ROG Phone 7 if longevity and future-proofing are prioritized.

My Choice: Asus ROG Phone 7

While the Razr 50's foldable design is intriguing, the ROG Phone 7's superior performance, longer battery life, and likely better camera make it the better overall device for my needs. I prioritize a smooth user experience and long-lasting battery, which the powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and 6000mAh battery deliver. The higher refresh rate display is also a significant factor for me. While the Razr 50 is more affordable and portable, the compromises in performance and battery life are too significant for my usage patterns. I would rather have a slightly larger phone with significantly better performance and longevity.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.