Apple iPhone X vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 3, 2017 April 28, 2022
Release Year 2017 2022

Physical

Volume 78.4 cm³ 105.94 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.18 "/g
Weight 174 g 210 g
Height 143.6 mm 162.5 mm
Width 70.9 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Space Gray
  • Silver
  • Stealth Black
  • Knight Silver
  • Cyber Yellow

Display

Screen Size 5.8 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1125 x 2436 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.1 % 86.2 %
Pixel Density 458 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 625 nits 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 80.74 mAh/in² 105.64 mAh/in²
Battery Density 34.64 mAh/cm³ 44.36 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 2716 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Apple A11 Bionic (10 nm) Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Hexa-core 2.39 GHz (2x Monsoon + 4x Mistral) Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Apple GPU (three-core graphics) Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features Lightning 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System iOS Android
Initial OS Version 11.1.1 12
Maximum OS Version 16.7.7 13

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's dive into a user-focused comparison of the Apple iPhone X and the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT. Forget the spec sheets for a moment; let's talk about what it feels like to use these phones.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

CategoryFeatureApple iPhone XXiaomi Poco F4 GTUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignVisual StyleClassic, minimalist iOS; premium materials.Bold, gamer-centric aesthetic, with a focus on performance.iPhone X: Elegant, feels sophisticated. Poco F4 GT: Edgy, feels powerful. The choice depends on personal style preference.
Display5.8" OLED, vibrant, high pixel density. Notch design.6.67" AMOLED, very smooth 120Hz refresh rate.iPhone X: Sharp, great for media consumption. Smaller size makes it easier for one-handed use. Poco F4 GT: Immersive experience, especially for gaming and video. The faster refresh rate means smoother scrolling and animations which can be really enjoyable.
Interaction FlowNavigationIntuitive gestures, smooth transitions.Android with smooth transitions.Both: Offer intuitive user experience. iPhone X: iOS is known for its simplicity. Poco F4 GT: More customizable, but may require a slightly steeper learning curve for iOS users.
Fingerprint SensorNone (uses Face ID)Side-mounted fingerprint sensor.iPhone X: Face ID is seamless but can be slower. Poco F4 GT: Fingerprint sensor is fast and reliable, preferred by some users.
Accessibility FeaturesOS Accessibility ToolsRobust, mature VoiceOver and display adjustments.Google's accessibility suite.Both: Offer comparable accessibility settings. iPhone X: Has been around longer, and so is likely more robust and reliable for those with vision or motor impairments.
Design ErgonomicsPhysical Size / WeightCompact and lighter, better for one hand and pocket.Larger and heavier, may be less comfortable for some hands.iPhone X: Easier for extended use, more portable. Poco F4 GT: May feel bulky after a while, but the larger screen is great for media consumption and gaming.
Build QualityPremium materialsDurable, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus screeniPhone X has a premium, luxury feel while Poco F4 GT is more focused on robustness and durability

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Story 1: The Urban Explorer

Imagine Sarah, a city photographer. She's constantly on the move, snapping shots of hidden alleys and vibrant street art.

  • iPhone X: Its smaller size and lighter weight mean Sarah can easily hold it in one hand while navigating busy streets. The sharp OLED display lets her quickly review her photos, and the dual-lens camera captures detail and depth, adding a professional touch to her street portraits. Face ID is a breeze when her hands are full of equipment.
  • Poco F4 GT: The large screen helps Sarah frame her shots, and the faster chipset ensures the phone doesn't lag while she edits on the go. While the phone is slightly larger and heavier, the enhanced battery life is a boon for her. The 120W fast charging makes sure she's never out of juice for long.

Story 2: The Mobile Gamer

Meet Alex, a gamer who lives for high-octane mobile battles.

  • iPhone X: While capable, the older chipset means some newer games might not run as smoothly. The 60Hz display is noticeable compared to gaming-centric phones, and it may struggle with longer play sessions due to a smaller battery.
  • Poco F4 GT: This is Alex's dream phone. The 120Hz AMOLED screen delivers incredibly smooth gameplay. The powerful Snapdragon processor crushes any game he throws at it, while the 120W fast charging means less time tethered to a plug. The additional side-mounted triggers provide added control.

Story 3: The Casual User

Let's consider Emily, who mainly uses her phone for messaging, browsing, and watching videos.

  • iPhone X: Emily loves the ease of iOS, and the high-quality display makes content viewing enjoyable. The overall premium feel makes it a device she loves using day to day.
  • Poco F4 GT: The larger screen provides more immersive media viewing, and the smooth refresh rate makes scrolling through social media a pleasure. The faster charging helps if she forgets to charge the device, ensuring it is up and running quickly.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

  • Visual Impairments: Both devices offer solid accessibility options with VoiceOver and screen customization. The iPhone's long history with accessibility features might give it a slight edge in this space, though the Poco's Android offerings are quite robust.
  • Motor Impairments: The lighter weight of the iPhone X may be more comfortable for some users. Both have voice control features.
  • Tech Newcomers: The iPhone's simplicity and well-established ecosystem make it potentially more accessible for new smartphone users. The Poco can be more complex due to its advanced features.
  • Diverse Needs: The choice largely depends on the specific user. If someone values a simple, refined experience, the iPhone may be the right pick. If performance, immersion, and the latest technology is a priority, the Poco is the more compelling choice.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

  • Simplicity vs. Performance: The iPhone X is focused on ease of use and elegant design. The Poco F4 GT is unapologetically about delivering top performance.
  • Portability vs. Immersion: The iPhone X is easier to carry and use one-handed. The Poco F4 GT offers a more immersive experience through its large display and advanced audio features.
  • Classic vs. Contemporary: The iPhone offers a classic user experience, while the Poco leans into the latest technologies, design and features.

My Choice and Why

Given these detailed comparisons, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT.

Here's why:

  • User Experience Priority: I strongly favor a high-refresh rate display for the everyday feeling of smooth usability.
  • Future-Proof Performance: The much newer chipset and higher benchmark score offer a more fluid, future-proof experience, which would allow you to use the device for a longer period without feeling the lag.
  • Enhanced Features: The 120W charging, large battery and stereo audio are features that can really add to the immersive experience.
  • Personal preference: The Poco is a device for someone who really appreciates technology, and wants the latest and greatest available.

While the iPhone X offers a refined, user-friendly iOS experience and is more portable, the Poco F4 GT offers a more impactful experience for my current needs, being a true tech enthusiast.

Ultimately, the "best" phone depends on individual needs and priorities. This detailed analysis provides user-centric insights to help inform the decision-making process.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.