Apple iPhone X vs Xiaomi Poco F4 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 3, 2017 June 27, 2022
Release Year 2017 2022

Physical

Volume 78.4 cm³ 95.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 174 g 195 g
Height 143.6 mm 163.2 mm
Width 70.9 mm 76 mm
Thickness 7.7 mm 7.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Space Gray
  • Silver
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green

Display

Screen Size 5.8 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1125 x 2436 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.1 % 86.6 %
Pixel Density 458 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 625 nits 900 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 80.74 mAh/in² 101.15 mAh/in²
Battery Density 34.64 mAh/cm³ 47.12 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 2716 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Apple A11 Bionic (10 nm) Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)
CPU Hexa-core 2.39 GHz (2x Monsoon + 4x Mistral) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)
GPU Apple GPU (three-core graphics) Adreno 650

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features Lightning 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System iOS Android
Initial OS Version 11.1.1 12
Maximum OS Version 16.7.7 13

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's dive into a user-centered analysis of the Apple iPhone X and the Xiaomi Poco F4. I'll focus on translating these technical specs into real-world experiences, using a narrative approach to make it relatable and engaging.

Comparative Analysis: Apple iPhone X vs. Xiaomi Poco F4

1. Design and Usability Assessment

CategoryFeatureApple iPhone XXiaomi Poco F4User Experience Impact
Interface DesignOperating SystemiOS 11.1.1 (upgradable to 16.7.7)Android 12 (upgradable to 13)iPhone X: Apple ecosystem, known for intuitive design but less customization. Poco F4: Android offers more flexibility, customization options.
Display TechnologyOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks, but Poco F4 has a higher refresh rate for smoother scrolling and animations.
Screen Size5.8"6.67"Poco F4 offers a more immersive visual experience for media consumption and gaming. iPhone X smaller form more pocketable.
Build MaterialGlass and Stainless SteelGlass and PlasticiPhone X feels premium, slightly more durable. Poco F4 can feel less premium but is more lightweight.
Interaction FlowRefresh Rate60Hz120HzPoco F4 delivers a smoother, more responsive feel with 120Hz screen refresh rate, especially noticeable in gaming and fast-paced content.
Fingerprint SensorNoneSide-mountedPoco F4 provides quick, reliable biometric security for unlocking and app authentication. iPhone X relies on FaceID.
ConnectivityWiFi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 5.0WiFi 6 (802.11ax), Bluetooth 5.2Poco F4 has newer technologies, offering faster WiFi speeds and better audio codecs for Bluetooth headphones.
Accessibility FeaturesSoftware FeaturesVoiceOver, AssistiveTouch, Display Accommodations, etc.Android Accessibility suite, screen readers, magnification, etc.Both have comprehensive accessibility features, catering to a wide range of user needs, but specific features vary based on the OS and device manufacturer.
Design ErgonomicsPhysical Size & Weight143.6 × 70.9 × 7.7 mm, 174g163.2 × 76 × 7.7 mm, 195giPhone X is lighter and easier to handle with one hand, while Poco F4 is taller, wider, slightly bulkier making it less ergonomic for smaller hands.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario 1: The Daily Commute

Imagine Sarah, a busy professional. She takes the train every morning and wants to catch up on the news and social media.

  • iPhone X: Sarah pulls out her iPhone X. The smaller screen is easy to manage in a crowded space. The OLED display shows vibrant colors but she sometimes struggles to read under the bright sun.
  • Poco F4: With the Poco F4, Sarah enjoys a larger screen, making reading articles easier, and with 1300 nits brightness, she can comfortably check her messages in the bright sunlight. The 120Hz display also makes scrolling through feeds a smooth experience.

Scenario 2: Capturing Memories

Let's picture Alex, a travel enthusiast, wants to capture beautiful moments during his adventures.

  • iPhone X: Alex takes a quick shot with the iPhone X. The dual camera provides great images, and the telephoto lens allows for some zoom capabilities.
  • Poco F4: Alex uses the Poco F4's 64MP camera with an additional wide-angle and macro lens, which makes his photos more versatile, especially in capturing landscapes and close-up details.

Scenario 3: Gaming and Entertainment

Meet Liam, a student who enjoys gaming and watching movies in his spare time.

  • iPhone X: Liam plays a casual game on the iPhone X, and the graphics are reasonably smooth, though the battery drains quite quickly.
  • Poco F4: Liam enjoys a much smoother gaming experience with the 120Hz refresh rate and impressive performance due to the Snapdragon 870, along with a large 4500mAh battery that lasts through long gaming sessions. The stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos give a more immersive experience.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

  • Tech-Savvy Users: Users who enjoy customization and want the latest features might lean towards the Poco F4. The fast charging, higher refresh rate, and extensive camera options are great features for them.
  • Ecosystem Seekers: Users who prefer a seamless and intuitive ecosystem might favor the iPhone X if they are integrated into the Apple ecosystem.
  • Budget-Conscious Users: The Poco F4 provides excellent value for its performance capabilities and would be preferred by budget-conscious users, as it has far better specs than the older iPhone X.
  • Users with Physical Limitations: The light weight of the iPhone X and the smaller size might be preferable for users with limited hand mobility, but a larger screen might be better for visually impaired users.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

CriteriaApple iPhone XXiaomi Poco F4
DisplaySharper screen but smaller, 60Hz refresh rateLarger, brighter screen, 120Hz refresh rate
PerformanceGood performance, older chipsetHigher benchmark scores, newer chipset, better multitasking
CameraDual lens, capable videoVersatile triple camera with additional wide-angle and macro lenses, 64MP resolution
BatterySmaller capacity, standard chargingLarger capacity, faster charging (67W)
SoftwareiOS ecosystem, intuitive but less customizableAndroid ecosystem, more customizable
DesignPremium materials, smaller and lighterGood build quality, larger and slightly heavier
AudioBasicDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers

Conclusion: Which Would I Choose?

If I were choosing between these two phones today, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F4. Here's why, from a design-centric perspective:

  • User Experience Evolution: The Poco F4 has made significant advancements in areas critical to the overall user experience: the fluid 120Hz refresh rate, the larger, brighter screen, significantly better battery life and faster charging, and the versatile triple camera system provide a better, more enjoyable experience.
  • Value for the User: The Poco F4 not only outperforms the iPhone X in a number of key areas, but is also the newer device, giving it an edge for long-term value and use. It's more attuned to what a contemporary user needs from a mobile device.
  • Future-Proofing: The newer chipset and features like WiFi 6, Bluetooth 5.2, and faster charging all contribute to a more modern and "future-proof" device than the older iPhone X.
  • Versatility: The Poco F4's camera system and audio capabilities, combined with the larger, smoother display, create a more versatile device for a variety of use cases, from media consumption to content creation.

While the iPhone X has the allure of the Apple ecosystem and its intuitive nature, the advancements in display, performance, battery, and camera technology in the Poco F4 make it the more compelling choice for a modern user seeking a device that truly enhances their day-to-day life.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.