Apple iPhone SE (2022) vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 18, 2022 May 13, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 67.99 cm³ 100.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.26 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 144 g 204 g
Height 138.4 mm 163.3 mm
Width 67.3 mm 73.6 mm
Thickness 7.3 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Red
  • Starlight
  • Midnight
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Black

Display

Screen Size 4.7 " 6.8 "
Resolution 750 x 1334 1116 x 2480
Aspect Ratio 16:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 65.4 % 92.9 %
Pixel Density 326 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 625 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 91.35 mAh/in² 108.13 mAh/in²
Battery Density 29.68 mAh/cm³ 49.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 2018 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Hexa-core (2x3.22 GHz Avalanche + 4x1.82 GHz Blizzard) Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Apple GPU (4-core graphics) Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features Lightning 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System iOS Android
Initial OS Version 15.4 12
Maximum OS Version 18 13

Comparison Summary

iPhone SE (2022) vs. ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: A Tale of Two Experiences

Let's embark on a journey beyond the spec sheet, exploring the iPhone SE (2022) and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra as distinct user experiences. We'll uncover how design choices shape interactions, weaving narratives that resonate with diverse users.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureiPhone SE (2022)ZTE Axon 40 UltraUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignFamiliar iOS, iconic home button, compact displayModern Android with under-display camera, expansive screenSE offers familiarity and one-handed ease; Axon 40 Ultra provides immersive visuals and a futuristic aesthetic.
Interaction FlowIntuitive gesture-based navigation, established UICustomizable Android experience, potential learning curveSE caters to users seeking simplicity; Axon 40 Ultra empowers customization enthusiasts.
AccessibilityRobust iOS accessibility featuresAndroid accessibility optionsBoth platforms offer strong accessibility features, empowering users with diverse needs.
ErgonomicsCompact, lightweight, comfortable one-handed useLarger, heavier, requires two hands for comfortable useSE excels in portability and one-handed operation; Axon 40 Ultra prioritizes screen real estate over single-hand usability.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional navigating a bustling city. The iPhone SE's compact design allows for effortless one-handed texting while grabbing coffee. Its familiar interface requires minimal cognitive load, enabling quick access to essential apps. Conversely, the Axon 40 Ultra, with its expansive display, transforms into a mobile cinema during the commute, immersing the user in vibrant videos. Its under-display camera maximizes screen real estate, creating a seamless viewing experience.

Design Choice Impact: The SE's design prioritizes efficiency and familiarity, catering to users who value speed and ease of use. The Axon 40 Ultra's design emphasizes immersion and visual spectacle, appealing to users who prioritize multimedia consumption and cutting-edge technology.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

User Perspectives: A senior citizen might find the SE's physical home button and intuitive iOS interface more accessible than the Axon 40 Ultra's gesture-based navigation. A young professional, however, might appreciate the Axon 40 Ultra's powerful performance and advanced camera features for content creation.

Recommendations: For users prioritizing simplicity, familiarity, and one-handed use, the iPhone SE is a compelling choice. For those seeking cutting-edge technology, immersive multimedia experiences, and customization options, the Axon 40 Ultra offers a compelling alternative.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Intuitive Comparison:

  • Prioritize Simplicity and Familiarity? Choose the iPhone SE.
  • Desire Immersive Multimedia and Customization? Choose the Axon 40 Ultra.
  • Value One-Handed Use and Portability? Choose the iPhone SE.
  • Seek Cutting-Edge Technology and Performance? Choose the Axon 40 Ultra.

Design-Driven Insights: Both devices embody distinct design philosophies. The SE champions timeless simplicity, while the Axon 40 Ultra embraces futuristic innovation. The best choice depends on individual priorities and how technology integrates into one's lifestyle.

My Choice: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

While I appreciate the iPhone SE's compact design and user-friendly interface, I would choose the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. Its expansive AMOLED display, coupled with the under-display camera, offers a truly immersive visual experience that captivates me. The powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor and advanced camera system empower me to explore my creative potential through mobile photography and videography. As a technology enthusiast, I am drawn to the Axon 40 Ultra's cutting-edge features and the potential for customization offered by the Android operating system. While the larger size might require two-handed use, the trade-off for a breathtaking visual experience is worthwhile for my personal preferences. Ultimately, the Axon 40 Ultra aligns more closely with my desire for a device that pushes the boundaries of mobile innovation and empowers creative expression.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.