Apple iPhone SE (2022) vs Motorola Razr 40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date March 18, 2022 June 21, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 67.99 cm³ 93.53 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.26 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 144 g 188.6 g
Height 138.4 mm 170.8 mm
Width 67.3 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.3 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Red
  • Starlight
  • Midnight
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom

Display

Screen Size 4.7 " 6.9 "
Resolution 750 x 1334 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 16:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 65.4 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 326 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 144 Hz
Typical Brightness 625 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 91.35 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 29.68 mAh/cm³ 44.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 2018 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Hexa-core (2x3.22 GHz Avalanche + 4x1.82 GHz Blizzard) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Apple GPU (4-core graphics) Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features Lightning 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System iOS Android
Initial OS Version 15.4 13
Maximum OS Version 18 16

Comparison Summary

The Classic vs. The Chameleon: iPhone SE (2022) and Motorola Razr 40

Let's embark on a journey beyond the gigabytes and megapixels, exploring the souls of two distinct mobile experiences: the Apple iPhone SE (2022) and the Motorola Razr 40. We'll delve into their design philosophies, user experience impacts, and how they cater to diverse needs.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureiPhone SE (2022)Motorola Razr 40User Experience Impact
Interface DesignFamiliar, iconic iOS; single screen experience; consistent navigation.Modern Android with foldable flexibility; dual-screen capabilities; customizable interface.SE offers predictability and simplicity. Razr 40 provides versatility and adaptability.
Interaction FlowIntuitive gesture-based navigation; one-handed usability prioritized due to compact size.Foldable design introduces unique interactions; external display for quick actions; split-screen multitasking.SE excels in single-hand use and quick tasks. Razr 40 offers expanded multitasking and unique form factor interactions.
Accessibility FeaturesComprehensive suite of iOS accessibility features (VoiceOver, Zoom, Switch Control).Standard Android accessibility options; foldable design may present challenges for some users.Both offer accessibility features, but SE's mature ecosystem provides a more robust experience.
Design ErgonomicsCompact, lightweight design; comfortable for one-handed use; durable build.Slim when unfolded, compact when folded; potential for creasing on the main display; heavier than the SE.SE prioritizes portability and comfortable handling. Razr 40 balances portability with a larger screen real estate when unfolded.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: A Day in the Life

Imagine Sarah, a busy professional who values efficiency. With the iPhone SE, she seamlessly navigates her day, effortlessly responding to emails with one hand on the train. Its compact design slips easily into her pocket. Meanwhile, David, a creative entrepreneur, thrives on the Razr 40's flexibility. He uses the external display for quick replies and then unfolds the phone for immersive video editing on a larger screen, showcasing a client presentation with a dramatic flourish thanks to the foldable design.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

User Personas:

  • Tech-Savvy Teenager: The Razr 40's novelty and unique features might appeal more, while the SE could be seen as too basic.
  • Senior Citizen: The SE's simplicity and familiar interface could be more user-friendly, while the Razr 40's foldable design might pose challenges.
  • Professional Photographer: The SE's reliable camera and compact form are convenient for quick captures, but the Razr 40's larger screen and versatile camera system offer more creative control.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Choosing the Right Device:

The iPhone SE is a reliable workhorse for users who prioritize simplicity, one-handed usability, and a seamless user experience within the Apple ecosystem. The Motorola Razr 40, on the other hand, caters to those seeking a unique, adaptable device that pushes the boundaries of mobile interaction and embraces a flexible form factor.

My Choice: The Motorola Razr 40

While I appreciate the iPhone SE's classic charm and user-friendly simplicity, the Motorola Razr 40 captivates me with its innovative spirit. As a technology communicator focused on design, I am drawn to the Razr 40's daring departure from conventional smartphone design. Its foldable form factor represents a significant step toward the future of mobile interaction, offering a glimpse into a world where devices seamlessly adapt to our evolving needs. The unique user experience, the potential for new forms of mobile storytelling, and the sheer audacity of the design make the Razr 40 a compelling choice for me. While acknowledging the potential challenges of a first-generation foldable device, I am excited by the possibilities it unlocks and the design conversations it ignites.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.