Apple iPhone 16 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 20, 2024 October 3, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 82.43 cm³ 100.18 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 3.15 "/g
Weight 170 g 213 g
Height 147.6 mm 162 mm
Width 71.6 mm 77.3 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Pink
  • Teal
  • Ultramarine
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • Graphite
  • Gray
  • Mint

Display

Screen Size 6.1 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1179 x 2556 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 88 %
Pixel Density 460 PPI 385 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 1000 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 2000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1900 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 95.70 mAh/in² 104.70 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.2 mAh/cm³ 46.92 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3561 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Apple A18 (3 nm) Exynos 2400e (4 nm)
CPU Hexa-core (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.20 GHz) 10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz)
GPU Apple GPU (5-core graphics) Xclipse 940

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, DisplayPort USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System iOS Android
Initial OS Version 18 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

iPhone 16 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: A Detailed Comparison

The smartphone landscape is heating up with the arrival of the iPhone 16 and the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE. Both devices promise impressive features and performance in the "medium price" range. But which one comes out on top? Let's dive deep into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Design

FeatureApple iPhone 16Samsung Galaxy S24 FEReal-World Implications
Dimensions147.6 x 71.6 x 7.8 mm162 x 77.3 x 8 mmS24 FE is noticeably larger; iPhone 16 is more pocketable
Weight170g213gS24 FE feels heavier in hand; iPhone 16 offers better one-handed use
Build Materials(Not provided)(Not provided)Durability and premium feel are undetermined without this information

Display

FeatureApple iPhone 16Samsung Galaxy S24 FEReal-World Implications
Display Size6.1 inches6.7 inchesS24 FE offers more screen real estate for media consumption
Display TypeSuper Retina XDR OLEDDynamic AMOLED 2XBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks, but specific panel quality impacts visual experience
Resolution1179 x 25561080 x 2340iPhone 16 boasts a sharper display with higher pixel density (460 ppi vs 385 ppi)
Refresh Rate(Not provided)120HzS24 FE's 120Hz delivers smoother scrolling and animations
Peak Brightness2000 nits (HBM)1900 nitsBoth offer excellent outdoor visibility; iPhone 16 might have a slight edge in extreme brightness

Performance

FeatureApple iPhone 16Samsung Galaxy S24 FEReal-World Implications
ChipsetApple A18 (3nm)Exynos 2400e (4nm)A18 is expected to deliver superior performance and efficiency due to its advanced node process
CPUHexa-coreDeca-coreCore count doesn't directly translate to performance; real-world usage and optimization matter more
GPUApple GPU (5-core)Xclipse 940Gaming and graphics-intensive tasks will likely perform better on the A18-powered iPhone 16
RAM8GB8GBBoth offer ample RAM for multitasking
Storage256GB/512GB256GB/512GBComparable storage options cater to various user needs

Battery Life

FeatureApple iPhone 16Samsung Galaxy S24 FEReal-World Implications
Battery Capacity3561 mAh4700 mAhS24 FE has significantly larger battery capacity, promising longer battery life

(Note: Camera specifications were not provided for in-depth comparison.)

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The iPhone 16, with its A18 chip, is likely to be the performance champion. Expect smoother gaming, faster app loading, and superior overall responsiveness.
  • Display: While the S24 FE offers a larger and smoother 120Hz display, the iPhone 16 boasts sharper visuals due to its higher resolution and pixel density.
  • Battery: The S24 FE's significantly larger battery should translate to longer usage time between charges. The iPhone 16, known for optimization, might still offer competitive battery life despite its smaller capacity.
  • Software: iOS and Android cater to different preferences. iOS is known for its simplicity and tight integration, while Android offers more customization options.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • iPhone 16: Ideal for users prioritizing performance, a compact form factor, and a seamless iOS experience. Excellent for power users, gamers, and those heavily invested in the Apple ecosystem.
  • Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: Best suited for users who value a large, smooth display, long battery life, and Android's flexibility. Great for media consumption, multitasking, and users seeking a feature-rich experience.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget and storage needs? Both phones offer similar storage options in the same price range.
  2. Do you prioritize performance or battery life? The iPhone 16 likely excels in performance, while the S24 FE boasts superior battery capacity.
  3. Which operating system do you prefer? Your familiarity and comfort with iOS or Android will heavily influence your decision.
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.