Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 16, 2022 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 98.52 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.79 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 240 g 192 g
Height 160.7 mm 168 mm
Width 77.6 mm 78 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Space Black
  • Deep Purple
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1290 x 2796 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.3 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 460 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 1000 nits 450 nits
HBM Brightness 2000 nits 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 96.30 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.88 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4323 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Hexa-core (2x3.46 GHz Everest + 4x2.02 GHz Sawtooth) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Apple GPU (5-core graphics) Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features Lightning 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System iOS Android
Initial OS Version 16 13
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max and the Xiaomi Poco C65. This isn't just about specs on a page, but how these devices will actually fit into your life. I'll break it down with my usual blend of technical detail and real-world usability.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here’s a look at the key technical specifications, side-by-side, with a focus on what they mean for you:

FeatureApple iPhone 14 Pro MaxXiaomi Poco C65Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions160.7 x 77.6 x 7.9 mm168 x 78 x 8.1 mmiPhone is slightly smaller overall. Poco is taller and thicker, slightly less pocketable
Weight240g192gPoco is significantly lighter, which can make it more comfortable for longer use
BuildStandardStandardBoth are typical 'slab' designs, not foldables or flip phones.
Display
Size6.7"6.74"Very similar sizes, a negligible difference that's likely unnoticeable
Resolution1290 x 2796720 x 1600iPhone has significantly sharper display; expect crisper text, images, and videos. Poco is more pixelated
PPI460260iPhone's display will be much clearer with higher pixel density
TechnologyOLEDIPS LCDiPhone boasts richer colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast. Poco's LCD is less vibrant and with lower color accuracy
Refresh Rate120Hz90HziPhone provides smoother scrolling and animations. Poco is slightly less smooth
Brightness2000 nits0 nitsiPhone is excellent under direct sunlight, ensuring clear readability. Poco may struggle in bright conditions
Performance
ChipsetApple A16 Bionic (4 nm)MediaTek Helio G85 (12 nm)iPhone’s chip is far more powerful, expect noticeably faster app launches, smoother multi-tasking, and superior gaming. The Poco chipset is significantly slower.
AnTuTu Score1,465,559237,768iPhone is significantly faster than Poco. This reflects daily performance (responsiveness, multitasking, gaming)
GPUApple GPU (5-core)Mali-G52 MC2iPhone's graphics are superior, offering better performance for gaming and graphic-intensive tasks
Camera
Rear Camera48MP (f/1.78), 1/1.3" sensor50MP (f/1.8), 1/2.76" sensoriPhone's main camera has a larger sensor for better light intake and more detail; also wider aperture (f/1.78), better low light performance
Selfie Camera12MP (f/1.9)8MP (f/2.2)iPhone's front-facing camera is better for selfies and video calls. wider aperture (f/1.9) results in better low-light performance
Telephoto Lens12MP (f/2.8)NoneiPhone has a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom capabilities. Poco lacks a telephoto lens
Wide Angle Lens12MP (f/2.2)NoneiPhone has an ultrawide camera for landscape and group photos. Poco lacks ultrawide camera
Portrait ModeNone2MP (f/2.4)Poco has a dedicated depth sensor, which can enable a software portrait mode
Macro LensNone2MP (f/2.4)Poco has a dedicated macro sensor.
Video RecordingUp to 4K 60fps w/ HDRUp to 1080p 30fpsiPhone captures high-resolution, more stable videos. Poco can't record in 4K
DxOMark ScoresMain: 146, Selfie: 145NoneiPhone excels in photography and videography.
Battery Life
Capacity4323mAh5000mAhPoco has a larger battery for potentially longer use on a single charge.
Charging20W Fast Charging18W Fast ChargingiPhone charges a bit faster.
Charging FeaturesMagSafe/Qi WirelessReverse chargingiPhone supports wireless charging. Poco allows for reverse charging
Software
OSiOS 16 (Upgradable to 18)Android 13Different ecosystems: iOS for Apple, Android for Google and others.
Connectivity
WiFiWiFi 6, MiMoWiFi 5iPhone's Wi-Fi is faster and more robust.
Bluetooth5.3 LE, AAC5.3 LE, APT-xBoth use the latest Bluetooth, Apple has AAC for its audio devices while Poco is equipped with Apt-x for better and faster audio
GPSGPS (L1+L5), QZSSStandard GPSiPhone's is better at locating your exact position
SIMNano + eSIMDual NanoiPhone is more convenient for those using eSIMs. Poco offers dual Nano SIM capabilities, without e-sim
Storage
Internal Storage128/256/512/1024GB128/256GBiPhone offers more options for high storage capacity
RAM6GB4/6/8GBPoco offers more RAM and storage options, leading to faster app loading, smoother multi-tasking, and better gaming performance
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone allows additional storage via microSD.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, DTS/X, Noise cancellationBasic AudioiPhone provides a much more immersive sound experience
Security
FeaturesBasicSide-mounted FingerprintPoco provides basic biometric authentication using fingerprint
Sensors
FeaturesProximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, BarometerFingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic ProximityEach phone has a different sensor selection
## 2. Key Insights

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Strengths:

  • Display King: The OLED display is significantly superior in terms of sharpness, color accuracy, brightness, and smoothness.
  • Performance Powerhouse: The A16 Bionic chip demolishes the competition in terms of sheer speed and efficiency, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and higher graphics in gaming.
  • Camera Prowess: The camera system is far more advanced, delivering better image quality across all conditions, especially in low-light scenarios. The telephoto lens provides true optical zoom. It’s also a professional grade video camera.
  • Premium Audio: The iPhone provides an immersive sound experience.
  • Ecosystem Advantage: If you're already invested in Apple's ecosystem, this phone integrates seamlessly with other Apple devices.

Xiaomi Poco C65 Strengths:

  • Budget-Friendly: The Poco C65 is an entry-level device that is more accessible.
  • Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery should offer a long battery life.
  • Lighter Build: Its lighter weight makes it more comfortable to use for extended periods.
  • Dual SIM: Dual Nano SIM capability without the need for an E-sim.

Trade-offs and Limitations:

  • iPhone 14 Pro Max: Its main drawback is its high price tag. It's also heavier and doesn't have expandable storage, which might be a deal-breaker for some.
  • Poco C65: The biggest compromises are in performance, display quality, and camera capabilities. It's not a device for power users or those who value image quality. The lack of high-brightness display makes it hard to use under bright conditions.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is ideal for:

  • Content Creators: Its exceptional camera and video capabilities, along with its powerful processor, make it great for those who want to capture high-quality content.
  • Power Users: If you require top-tier performance for demanding apps, gaming, and multitasking, this is the phone for you.
  • Apple Ecosystem Users: If you already own Apple devices, the seamless integration is a major plus.
  • Professional Photographers: The advanced sensors, image processing, and RAW capabilities will suit the needs of professionals.

Xiaomi Poco C65 is best suited for:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: If you're looking for an affordable smartphone for basic tasks, the Poco C65 is a reasonable option.
  • Casual Users: Those who primarily use their phones for web browsing, social media, and messaging.
  • First-time Smartphone Users: The Poco C65 is a very reasonable option for new smartphone users.
  • Users seeking more RAM: For multitasking and gaming, the Poco C65 with 8GB of RAM is ideal for users on a budget.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to guide your decision:

  1. What is your primary use case? If you need top-tier performance, camera, and display, the iPhone is the clear choice. If you need a phone for basic tasks, then the Poco will fit the bill.
  2. What is your budget? The iPhone 14 Pro Max is expensive, while the Poco is far more affordable. This is an important determining factor.
  3. How important is display quality and camera quality? If crisp displays and high-quality photos and videos are paramount, the iPhone has a decisive edge. If these are not high priority, then the Poco is an acceptable alternative.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • High-Quality Media Creation: Choose the iPhone for its video recording capabilities and camera quality.
  • Budget Gaming: Choose the iPhone for its performance. The Poco will not be suitable.
  • Budget Smartphone: Choose the Poco. It offers a decent experience for those who can't afford the higher-end devices.
  • Apple Ecosystem User: Go for the iPhone. Its integration with the Apple ecosystem is unmatched.
  • Dual Nano SIM Card Users: Go for the Poco. It features Dual Nano-SIM capability and will be better suited for users in need of that functionality.

What would I choose?

If I were picking between these two phones, I'd go with the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max. Despite its higher cost, the performance, display, and camera are in a different league. As someone who appreciates high-quality technology and needs a reliable device for demanding tasks, the iPhone is the better fit. I also value seamless integration, which the Apple Ecosystem delivers, and I appreciate the excellent audio quality. While the Poco offers a very practical set of features for the price, the compromises in display, performance, and camera are simply too significant for me.

There you have it - a deep dive comparison. Hopefully, this helps you make the right choice!

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.