Alright, let's dive deep into the battle of the titans: the Apple iPhone 13 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. These are two very different beasts, each with its own strengths and quirks. As a tech journalist with an engineering background, I'm less interested in marketing hype and more focused on how these specs translate into real-world performance. Let's break it down.
1. Specifications Breakdown
Here's a detailed table comparing the key technical specifications of the iPhone 13 Pro and the Axon 40 Ultra, along with the practical implications:
Feature | Apple iPhone 13 Pro | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | Real-World Implications |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 146.7 x 71.5 x 7.7 mm, 204g | 163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm, 204g | Axon 40 Ultra is significantly larger, while both have the same weight, affecting pocketability and one-hand use. |
Build | Premium Materials | Premium Materials | Both offer a high-end feel; specific materials (glass, metal, ceramic) not listed but important for durability. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.1" | 6.8" | Axon 40 Ultra’s larger screen is great for media and multitasking, iPhone 13 Pro is more compact. |
Resolution | 1170 x 2532 | 1116 x 2480 | iPhone 13 Pro has slightly sharper, more detailed text and images. |
Pixel Density | 460 ppi | 400 ppi | iPhone 13 Pro display will look noticeably sharper. |
Technology | OLED | AMOLED | Both offer excellent contrast, color, and deep blacks; differences likely to be minor. |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations. |
Brightness | 1200 nits | 1500 nits | Axon 40 Ultra is significantly better for outdoor visibility in bright sunlight. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) | Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | iPhone 13 Pro has better benchmark performance, and generally smoother app launching and multitasking. |
Antutu Score | 1,325,768 | 1,061,300 | iPhone 13 Pro is faster, offering a more responsive user experience. |
GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Adreno 730 | Both provide smooth high-end gaming, but the performance might vary in specific graphically demanding games. |
Camera | |||
Main Camera | 12MP, f/1.5, 1/1.66" | 64MP, f/1.6, 1/1.72" | iPhone 13 Pro has larger pixels and a wider aperture and larger sensor for better low light performance, despite the megapixel difference. |
Telephoto Lens | 12MP, f/2.8 | 64MP, f/3.5, 1/2" | Axon 40 Ultra has higher resolution but smaller aperture and sensor. iPhone 13 Pro has a brighter lens for better zoom in low light |
Ultrawide Lens | 12MP, f/1.8 | None | iPhone 13 Pro offers an ultrawide lens, offering versatility in shot composition. |
Wide Angle + Macro | None | 64MP, f/2.3, 1/1.72" | Axon 40 Ultra offers a dedicated wide angle + macro lens for close-up shots. |
Front Camera | 12MP, f/2.2 | 16MP, f/2.0 | Axon 40 Ultra has higher resolution front facing, useful for detailed selfies. |
ToF 3D sensor | 12MP | 0.3MP | iPhone 13 Pro has a more advanced ToF 3D sensor, which affects depth-sensing and augmented reality performance. |
Video Recording | Up to 4K 60fps w/ HDR | Up to 8K 30fps w/ HDR | Axon 40 Ultra offers higher resolution video, while both devices offer excellent video recording capabilities. |
DxOMark | 141 Main, 134 Selfie | Not Listed | iPhone 13 Pro's camera is very highly-rated, while Axon 40 Ultra's rating is not listed here. |
Battery Life | |||
Capacity | 3125 mAh | 5000 mAh | Axon 40 Ultra should provide much better battery life thanks to its significantly larger battery. |
Charging Speed | 20W | 65W | Axon 40 Ultra charges much faster, allowing quicker top-ups. |
Wireless Charging | 15W MagSafe, 7.5W Qi | None | iPhone 13 Pro has wireless charging capabilities, offering added convenience. |
Other | |||
Operating System | iOS 15 (upgradable to iOS 18) | Android 12 (upgradable to 13) | iOS is known for its user-friendliness and deep integration, while Android offers more customization. |
RAM | 6GB | 8/12/16/18GB | Axon 40 Ultra has significantly more RAM, which allows for more intense multitasking and future proofing. |
Internal Storage | Up to 1TB | Up to 1TB | Both offer ample space for apps, media, and files; neither have expandable storage. |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 | Axon 40 Ultra has a newer Bluetooth version, offering more stable connections and better battery efficiency. |
WiFi | WiFi 6 | WiFi 6 with Direct and Display | Axon 40 Ultra has more WiFi capabilities. |
GPS | GPS, GLONASS, QZSS, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, Dual Band GPS | Axon 40 Ultra supports more satellite systems for better location accuracy. |
Security | Basic Security | Basic fingerprint sensor | Axon 40 Ultra provides additional biometric security using a fingerprint sensor. |
Audio | Dolby Atmos and more | DTS / DTS X and more | iPhone 13 Pro has higher end audio features. |
2. Key Insights
Apple iPhone 13 Pro:
- Strengths: The iPhone 13 Pro excels in raw performance thanks to its A15 Bionic chip. It also has a sharper display, a highly rated camera system, enhanced audio features, and smooth integration with the Apple ecosystem. Its smaller size makes it easier to handle one handed.
- Competitive Advantages: Its user experience is generally more polished, and it offers excellent camera performance with consistently good results. The smaller size makes it more pocketable.
- Trade-offs: The battery life is less impressive, and the charging is slower than the competition.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra:
- Strengths: The Axon 40 Ultra shines with its huge display, large battery, and rapid charging. It also has very high resolution cameras, and features a unique macro + wide angle lens.
- Competitive Advantages: The sheer size of the screen is perfect for media consumption, and the massive battery and fast charging make sure you don't get stranded.
- Trade-offs: The Axon 40 Ultra falls behind in raw performance, and its software experience may not be as refined or polished as the iPhone 13 Pro. It is also much larger and therefore more difficult to hold.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
Apple iPhone 13 Pro:
- Best Suited For: Users who prioritize raw speed, a premium experience, a very good camera, and a seamless user experience. It is an excellent phone for general use and people already within the apple ecosystem.
- Use Cases: Ideal for professionals who need a fast and reliable phone, users who enjoy high-quality mobile photography and videography, and those who value the Apple ecosystem.
- Price-to-Value: The iPhone 13 Pro sits in the higher premium range and while it comes with great value the price point makes it a poor choice for anyone on a budget.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra:
- Best Suited For: Users who want a large screen for media consumption and a battery that lasts all day. It’s also good for mobile photography with a very flexible camera setup, as well as users who would benefit from massive amounts of RAM.
- Use Cases: Great for binge-watching content, hardcore mobile gaming, power users that need tons of resources, or for travel.
- Price-to-Value: The Axon 40 Ultra offers excellent specs for its price, and its low price point makes it a great option for users who need great specs without breaking the bank.
4. Buying Decision Framework
Here are three practical questions to help you decide:
- Do you prioritize raw performance and a seamless, polished user experience? If yes, the iPhone 13 Pro is the clear winner. If you’d rather have a massive screen and a battery that lasts all day then consider the ZTE.
- How much do you value display size and battery life? If these are top priorities, the Axon 40 Ultra is a better choice due to its huge screen and significantly larger battery. If you value a compact phone consider the iphone 13 Pro.
- Are you invested in an ecosystem? If you already own Apple devices and use services like iMessage and iCloud, the iPhone 13 Pro offers the best integration. If you are not then consider the ZTE.
Based on these questions, consider these scenario-based recommendations:
- Scenario 1: The Power User. If you need the fastest performance and want the highest possible quality in mobile photography and video, choose the iPhone 13 Pro. The Axon is a good choice if you need lots of RAM for multitasking, and a big display for gaming and media.
- Scenario 2: The Multimedia Maven. If you value a big screen for movies, social media, and reading, as well as all day battery life, go for the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. The iPhone 13 Pro has a good display but can't compete with the screen size and battery capacity.
- Scenario 3: The Mobile Photographer. Both phones have excellent cameras, but the iPhone 13 Pro has slightly better image quality and video capabilities, while the Axon has a very versatile camera setup, and higher resolution cameras.
- Scenario 4: The Budget-Conscious User. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is the better option. It has almost as many features, and a much larger screen and battery, but is also likely to be significantly less expensive.
What I Would Choose
If I were making the choice, I'd lean towards the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. Here’s why:
As a tech journalist and someone who has had their hands on a LOT of phones, I value cutting edge features and long battery life. While the iPhone has its strengths, the Axon 40 Ultra's sheer display size, massive battery, and faster charging appeal to my needs more. The multiple high-resolution cameras and huge RAM are also features I find useful when comparing mobile devices.
While I would miss the smoothness and polish of the iPhone, the Axon's unique hardware and cutting edge features are ultimately more intriguing and appealing to me.
Ultimately, the "best" phone depends on individual needs and preferences, but in this case, the ZTE offers more of what I need, and at a lower price.