Apple iPhone 12 Pro vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 23, 2020 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2020 2024

Physical

Volume 77.62 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.23 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 189 g 189 g
Height 146.7 mm 171.4 mm
Width 71.5 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Graphite
  • Pacific Blue
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.1 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1170 x 2532 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.1 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 460 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 75.65 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 36.27 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 2815 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Hexa-core (2x3.1 GHz Firestorm + 4x1.8 GHz Icestorm) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Apple GPU (4-core graphics) Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features Lightning 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System iOS Android
Initial OS Version 14.1 14
Maximum OS Version 18 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureApple iPhone 12 ProMotorola Razr 50 UltraPractical Impact
Form FactorStandardFoldableMotorola offers a unique, compact form factor when folded; iPhone 12 Pro is a traditional slab phone.
Dimensions146.7 x 71.5 x 7.4 mm171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmMotorola is taller and slightly wider when unfolded. Both are similar in thickness.
Weight189g189gBoth feel similar in hand in terms of weight.
Build Quality (Screen Protection)UnknownCorning Gorilla Glass VictusMotorola offers superior scratch and drop resistance on the external screen.

Display

FeatureApple iPhone 12 ProMotorola Razr 50 UltraPractical Impact
Size6.1"6.9"Motorola provides a larger screen for immersive viewing; iPhone 12 Pro is more pocketable.
Resolution1170x25321080x2640Both offer sharp images; differences are minor in daily use.
Pixel Density460 ppi413 ppiiPhone 12 Pro has slightly sharper text and images due to higher pixel density.
TechnologyOLEDiPhone 12 Pro will likely have better colors and contrast. Motorola's technology is unknown.
Refresh Rate60Hz165HzMotorola offers significantly smoother scrolling, animations, and gaming experience.
Brightness1200 nits3000 nitsMotorola is much better visible under direct sunlight.

Performance

FeatureApple iPhone 12 ProMotorola Razr 50 UltraPractical Impact
ChipsetApple A14 Bionic (5 nm)Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)Motorola's chipset is newer, resulting in better efficiency and potentially longer software support.
AnTuTu Score1,082,6441,625,000Motorola offers a faster experience with demanding apps and games.
GPUApple GPU (4-core graphics)Adreno 735Motorola generally offers better graphics performance for gaming.
RAM6 GB12 GBMotorola allows for smoother multitasking and running more apps in the background.

Camera

FeatureApple iPhone 12 ProMotorola Razr 50 UltraPractical Impact
Main Camera12MP, f/1.6, 1/2.55"50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.96"Motorola captures more detail due to higher resolution, while iPhone 12 Pro might perform better in low light with the wider aperture and larger pixel size.
Telephoto Lens12MP, f/2.0, 1.0µm50MP, f/2.0, 0.64µm (Telephoto + portrait)iPhone 12 Pro has a dedicated telephoto lens, while Motorola uses Telephoto + portrait camera
Wide Angle Lens12MP, f/2.4N/AiPhone 12 Pro offers a wider field of view for landscape shots and group photos.
Selfie Camera12MP, f/2.232MP, f/2.4Motorola captures sharper selfies with more detail.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@60fps with HDRUp to 4K@60fps with HDRBoth provide high-quality video recording.
DxOMark (Mobile)127N/AiPhone 12 Pro's camera quality is well-established through independent testing.

Battery

FeatureApple iPhone 12 ProMotorola Razr 50 UltraPractical Impact
Capacity2815 mAh4000 mAhMotorola will likely have significantly longer battery life.
Charging20W Fast Charging45W Fast ChargingMotorola charges much faster, reducing downtime.
Wireless Charging15W (MagSafe), 7.5W (Qi)15WBoth support wireless charging; iPhone 12 Pro offers MagSafe compatibility.
FeaturesN/AReverse ChargingMotorola can be used to wirelessly charge other devices.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Advantages:

  • Established Camera Performance: DxOMark score provides a baseline for camera quality, especially video.
  • Wide Angle Lens: Offers versatility for landscape and group photography.
  • MagSafe: Convenient magnetic wireless charging and accessory ecosystem.
  • Better software support Apple is known for providing updates to their devices for much longer, while Motorola's software support is shorter.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Foldable Form Factor: Unique and compact design when folded, larger screen when unfolded.
  • Significantly Brighter Display: Superior outdoor visibility.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling, animations, and gaming.
  • Larger Battery & Faster Charging: Longer battery life and quicker recharge times.
  • More RAM: Smoother multitasking and app performance.
  • Newer Chipset: Potentially better efficiency and longer software support.

Trade-offs:

  • Motorola's foldable design sacrifices camera versatility.
  • iPhone 12 Pro has a smaller battery and slower charging.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Apple iPhone 12 Pro:

  • Ideal User: Prefers a compact, reliable smartphone with a good camera and values the iOS ecosystem.
  • Use Cases:
    • Photography and videography where established image quality is important.
    • Users heavily invested in the Apple ecosystem (AirPods, Apple Watch, etc.).
    • Users needing a pocketable device.
    • Users who want a longer software support.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra:

  • Ideal User: Wants a unique, cutting-edge smartphone with a large, vibrant display and values long battery life and fast charging.
  • Use Cases:
    • Media consumption (videos, browsing) on a large screen.
    • Multitasking and gaming.
    • Users who value a compact phone when folded
    • Users who want a unique phone that will stand out

4. Decision Framework

Consider these questions:

  1. Do you value a unique and compact form factor? If yes, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the better choice.
  2. Is camera versatility (ultra-wide lens) or established image quality more important? If versatility and quality are crucial, the iPhone 12 Pro may be preferable.
  3. Do you prioritize battery life and fast charging? If so, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the clear winner.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Travel Photographer: iPhone 12 Pro (for established image quality and wide-angle lens).
  • Media Enthusiast: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (for large, vibrant display and long battery life).
  • Tech Innovator: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (for the foldable design and cutting-edge features).
  • Apple Ecosystem User: iPhone 12 Pro (for seamless integration with other Apple devices).

My Choice

I would choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra. While the iPhone 12 Pro is a solid phone, the Razr 50 Ultra offers a more compelling package for my needs. The larger, brighter, and smoother display is a big draw for media consumption and general use. The foldable form factor offers a unique experience. Finally, the superior battery life and faster charging are very practical advantages. Although the camera system might not be as established as the iPhone's, it seems capable enough for most everyday scenarios. The benefits of the Razr 50 Ultra outweigh the established camera performance and wider lens of the iPhone 12 Pro.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.