Smartphone Comparison: Apple iPhone 12 mini vs. Motorola Razr 50
1. Specifications Comparison
Feature | Apple iPhone 12 mini | Motorola Razr 50 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Form Factor | Standard | Foldable | Razr 50 offers a unique foldable design for a more compact form factor when closed and larger screen when opened |
Dimensions | 131.5 × 64.2 × 7.4 mm | 171.3 × 74 × 7.3 mm | Razr 50 is significantly larger when unfolded, impacting pocketability and one-handed use. iPhone 12 mini is much more compact. |
Weight | 135g | 188.4g | iPhone 12 mini is considerably lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use. |
Display | |||
Size | 5.4" | 6.9" | Razr 50 provides a much larger display for enhanced media consumption and multitasking. iPhone 12 mini is very small for modern usage standards. |
Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1080x2640 | Razr 50 has slightly more pixels, but the difference is not that noticeable |
Pixel Density | 476 PPI | 413 PPI | iPhone 12 mini's higher PPI results in a sharper, more detailed display. |
Technology | OLED | iPhone 12 mini's OLED screen provides better contrast and color accuracy. The Razr 50 is not specified, meaning we can't determine it's picture quality | |
Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 120Hz | Razr 50 offers a smoother visual experience with its higher refresh rate. |
Brightness | 1200 nits | 3000 nits | Razr 50 is significantly better for outdoor use in bright sunlight. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm) | iPhone 12 mini's A14 Bionic offers substantially higher performance for gaming and demanding apps. |
AnTuTu Score | 1,072,354 | 620,395 | iPhone 12 mini demonstrates superior real-world performance based on benchmark scores. |
GPU | Apple GPU (4-core graphics) | Mali-G615 MC2 | iPhone 12 mini has a more powerful GPU for graphically intense tasks. |
Camera | |||
Main Camera | 12MP f/1.6 | 50MP f/1.8 | Razr 50 offers higher resolution, but iPhone 12 mini has a wider aperture which can be better in low light |
Selfie Camera | 12MP f/2.2 | 32MP f/2.4 | Razr 50 captures higher resolution selfies, with the iPhone having a wider aperture for low light. |
Wide-Angle Camera | 12MP f/2.4 | 13MP f/2.2 | Razr 50 has slightly higher resolution, while also having a wider aperture |
Video Recording | 4K@60fps with HDR, Stereo Sound | 4K@30fps with EIS | iPhone 12 mini offers more flexibility in video recording (higher framerates, better stabilization, more slow motion), while the Razr 50 has less flexible options |
DxOMark Mobile Score | 117 (Photo 128, Video 129) | 92 (Photo 0, Video 0) | iPhone 12 mini has a significantly better overall camera performance, especially in video. Razr 50 has only been tested for the main camera and did not get a good score for photo/video |
DxOMark Selfie Score | 132 (Photo 127, Video 140) | Not Tested | iPhone 12 mini has a tested and better selfie camera |
Battery | |||
Capacity | 2227mAh | 4200mAh | Razr 50 has a much larger battery, likely providing significantly longer battery life. |
Charging | 20W Fast Charging | 30W Fast Charging | Razr 50 charges faster than the iPhone 12 mini |
Features | MagSafe & Qi wireless charging | 15W wireless, Reverse charging | iPhone 12 mini has MagSafe, Razr 50 has reverse charging and 15W Wireless. |
Software | |||
OS | iOS 14.1 (Upgradable to 18) | Android 14 | Different ecosystems. iOS offers more updates and is simpler to use, while Android is more customizable |
Connectivity | |||
Wi-Fi | WiFi 6 | WiFi 6E | Razr 50 supports a faster and more efficient WiFi 6E standard. |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 | Razr 50 has a more up-to-date Bluetooth version, improving power efficiency. |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | Razr 50 supports SUPL, while the iPhone supports QZSS. Both provide good accuracy. |
Storage | |||
Internal | 64/128/256/512 GB | 256/512 GB | Both phones have 512 GB options, but the iPhone has a lower storage option. Neither phone can be expanded. |
RAM | 4 GB | 8/12 GB | Razr 50 is much better for multitasking with more RAM. |
Audio | |||
Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphones | Both phones offer high-quality audio, Razr 50 has 3 microphones, while the iPhone 12 mini has Dolby Digital Plus |
Security | |||
Features | Basic security features | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Razr 50 provides biometric security with a fingerprint sensor for convenient unlocking. |
Build Quality | |||
Screen Protection | Unknown | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Razr 50 has superior screen protection |
Sensors | |||
Sensors | Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Barometer | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Gravity | Razr 50 has a Fingerprint sensor and gravity sensors, the iPhone 12 mini has a Barometer |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Apple iPhone 12 mini Advantages:
- Superior Performance: The A14 Bionic chip provides significantly better processing power and benchmark scores, leading to a smoother experience for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and AR applications.
- Higher Pixel Density: The sharper display with 476 PPI provides enhanced clarity, crucial for detailed text and images.
- Better Camera Quality: The iPhone 12 mini has a higher DxOMark score, meaning that it provides better picture and video taking capabilities than the Razr 50. The selfie camera is also vastly superior.
- Established Ecosystem: iOS is known for its user-friendliness, regular software updates, and integration with other Apple devices.
- Compact Size: The iPhone 12 mini is much smaller and lighter than the Razr 50 which can be advantageous in certain use cases.
- MagSafe: Unique magsafe features are present
Motorola Razr 50 Advantages:
- Unique Foldable Design: The Razr 50 offers a unique foldable form factor, making it compact when closed and expanding to a larger screen size when opened.
- Larger Display: The 6.9" screen is much larger, ideal for media consumption, gaming, and multitasking.
- Higher Refresh Rate: The 120Hz refresh rate offers smoother scrolling and animations.
- Brighter Screen: The 3000 nits brightness makes the screen much more visible in bright outdoor conditions.
- Bigger Battery: The much larger battery capacity means that the phone can last longer on a single charge.
- Faster Charging: 30W fast charging allows for quicker replenishment of the larger battery.
- More RAM: 8/12 GB of RAM gives a much better multitasking experience than 4GB.
- Up to Date Connectivity: Supports newer Wifi and Bluetooth Standards
Significant Trade-offs:
- iPhone 12 mini: Smaller battery, smaller display and slower refresh rate than Razr 50, older software,
- Motorola Razr 50: Less powerful chipset, a much lower benchmark score, no indication of screen quality, heavier and larger, untested camera score,
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Apple iPhone 12 mini Ideal User:
- Users seeking a truly compact device: Those who prioritize pocketability and one-handed use.
- Performance Enthusiasts: Users who need a powerful device for gaming, AR, and demanding apps.
- Camera Focused Users: Those who want high-quality photos and videos, especially selfies.
- Apple Ecosystem Users: Those who want seamless integration with Apple products and services.
- Users who prefer software updates: The iPhone 12 mini will get much more updates than the Razr 50
- Users who want better resale value: iPhones often retain their value more than Android devices.
Use Cases:
- Gaming on the go.
- High-quality photography and videography.
- Seamless integration with Apple ecosystem.
- Use as secondary phone due to small form factor
Motorola Razr 50 Ideal User:
- Early Adopters: Users attracted to cutting-edge foldable technology.
- Media Consumers: Those who prefer a large display for watching videos and browsing.
- Multitaskers: Users who need a large screen and plenty of RAM for running multiple apps.
- Users who want a larger battery and faster charging.
- Users who value cutting-edge connectivity standards.
Use Cases:
- Watching movies and TV shows on a large screen.
- Reading documents and browsing the web.
- Handling multiple productivity apps simultaneously.
- Using the device in bright outdoor environments.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The iPhone 12 mini is older, making it potentially more affordable than the newer Razr 50, offering great performance and camera quality, though it may lack some modern conveniences.
- The Motorola Razr 50, however, offers more modern features like a foldable design and a larger display, but at a higher price.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Form Factor: Do you prefer a compact, easy-to-handle phone or a larger screen that folds?
- Performance: How important is having a fast, high-performance phone?
- Camera Quality: How important is having a high-quality camera that takes great pictures and videos, especially selfies?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- For Performance & Compactness: If your priority is performance and you prefer a smaller, easier-to-handle device, the iPhone 12 mini is the better choice.
- For Media & Multitasking: If you want a large display, better connectivity and a unique, foldable design with excellent battery, the Motorola Razr 50 is the better choice.
- For Value: If you want a phone that is cheaper but still performs well in day-to-day tasks, with the best possible camera, then the iPhone 12 mini is the better option.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Motorola Razr 50. Despite the performance disadvantage, the Razr 50 provides a more modern user experience, with the larger, brighter and higher refresh rate display. The foldable form factor is also a big selling point, allowing for a much smaller and more pocketable form factor when closed.
While the iPhone 12 mini is a good phone, the smaller screen size makes it difficult to use in the modern world, and the older hardware would also be a limitation. The Razr 50 offers better connectivity with its support for WiFi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3. Finally, the much larger battery and faster charging would be a big benefit to me.