Apple iPhone 11 Pro vs Motorola Razr 40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date September 20, 2019 June 21, 2023
Release Year 2019 2023

Physical

Volume 83.28 cm³ 93.53 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.09 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 188 g 188.6 g
Height 144 mm 170.8 mm
Width 71.4 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Matte Space Gray
  • Matte Silver
  • Matte Gold
  • Matte Midnight Green
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom

Display

Screen Size 5.8 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1125 x 2436 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.3 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 458 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 90.55 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 36.57 mAh/cm³ 44.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3046 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Apple A13 Bionic (7 nm+) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Hexa-core (2x2.65 GHz Lightning + 4x1.8 GHz Thunder) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Apple GPU (4-core graphics) Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features Lightning 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System iOS Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 18 16

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's dive into a user-focused comparison of the Apple iPhone 11 Pro and the Motorola Razr 40. We're not just looking at specs; we're exploring how these devices fit into your life.

1. Design and Usability Assessment: The User Experience Lens

CategoryApple iPhone 11 ProMotorola Razr 40User Experience Impact
Design PhilosophySolid, premium build; focus on reliability and a familiar, consistent experience.Innovative, foldable design; emphasis on a unique form factor and modern aesthetic.iPhone: Offers a sense of familiarity and durability; Razr: Provides a novel experience and stands out.
Interface DesignIntuitive iOS interface; focus on simplicity and ease of use.Clean Android interface with added Motorola features; optimized for foldable interactions.iPhone: Easy to pick up and use, even for beginners; Razr: Requires some learning to fully utilize the foldable design, but offers unique interaction possibilities.
Interaction FlowFluid navigation with gestures; consistent experience across apps.Optimized flow for both open and closed states; quick access to information on the external screen.iPhone: Very consistent and reliable user flow, good for everyday tasks; Razr: Offers unique interaction options, but the UI is more dynamic and contextual based on how you hold it.
Accessibility FeaturesRobust accessibility settings (VoiceOver, Switch Control, etc.).Standard Android accessibility features with Motorola additions.iPhone: Excellent choice for those with specific accessibility needs; Razr: Provides good general accessibility; both platforms offer similar options and should suit the user.
Design ErgonomicsSolid and weighty in hand; traditional smartphone shape.Sleek and light when unfolded; portable when folded but a bit taller than traditional phones.iPhone: Feels dependable and sturdy, great for one-handed use; Razr: Offers unique form factor and better portability when folded, but its large size could be less ergonomic than the iPhone in one-handed use scenarios.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration: Stories Behind the Tech

Scenario 1: The Commuter

  • iPhone 11 Pro: Sarah, a daily commuter, relies on the iPhone 11 Pro for its stable performance and robust build. The compact size fits well in her bag, and the consistent iOS interface allows her to easily navigate through music, podcasts, and emails. The excellent screen visibility makes reading on the go comfortable, and its durability is reassuring during busy commutes.
  • Motorola Razr 40: Mark, on the same train, appreciates the Razr 40's unique design. When folded, it easily slips into his pocket. Unfolded, its large display is perfect for catching up on the news or watching videos. The smaller external screen lets him quickly glance at notifications or control music without fully opening the device, a convenient feature during crowded commutes.

Scenario 2: The Photographer

  • iPhone 11 Pro: Emily uses the iPhone 11 Pro for capturing the everyday moments. The triple camera system allows her to switch between different lenses quickly—standard, telephoto, and wide—capturing various perspectives. The optical image stabilization (OIS) reduces camera shake, resulting in sharp photos, and the Night Mode enhances low-light images.
  • Motorola Razr 40: David enjoys shooting on the Razr 40's 64MP main camera, capturing detailed shots with vibrant color and high-resolution. He appreciates the "selfie" functionality with the main camera and its ability to take wide angle pictures for group photos. The time-lapse feature allows for creative videos. He uses the flip design to easily capture unique angles.

Scenario 3: The Gamer

  • iPhone 11 Pro: Alex games on the iPhone 11 Pro, benefiting from the smooth operation provided by the Apple A13 Bionic chip. The solid performance ensures a lag-free gaming experience, and the vibrant OLED display enhances the visual immersion.
  • Motorola Razr 40: Ben, a mobile gamer, values the Razr 40's 144Hz refresh rate display for fast, fluid animations. He uses it to read information while he plays a game, something that was a bit harder to do on the iPhone. The large, vibrant display of Razr 40 offers an enjoyable experience.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation: Considering Diverse Users

  • For Users Seeking Simplicity: The iPhone 11 Pro’s consistency and reliability make it a great choice. Its user-friendly interface and established ecosystem make it accessible to users of all tech backgrounds.
  • For Users Seeking Novelty: The Motorola Razr 40’s foldable design offers a new interaction experience. It suits users who appreciate innovative designs and are comfortable with the nuances of a foldable device.
  • For Users Needing Portability: The Razr 40 is ideal when folded for easy pocket carry. It offers a larger screen experience when unfolded, providing both portability and large display capability.
  • For Tech-Savvy Users: Both phones have their advantages. The iPhone 11 Pro’s performance and mature software are appealing, while the Razr 40’s advanced display and camera features cater to those who like to explore new technologies.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework: Making the Right Choice

FeatureApple iPhone 11 ProMotorola Razr 40Which User Will Benefit Most
Form FactorTraditional, solid smartphone.Foldable, unique design.iPhone: Users seeking reliability; Razr: Users who value innovation.
DisplayHigh-quality OLED, slightly smaller, higher pixel density, 60Hz refresh rate.Larger OLED display with faster 144Hz refresh rate.iPhone: Users who value sharp visuals; Razr: Users who enjoy fast animations and a bigger screen.
PerformanceSlightly faster benchmark performance with A13 Bionic chip; Apple eco system advantage.Good performance for daily tasks with Snapdragon 7 Gen 1.iPhone: Power users, demanding app users, gaming. Razr: Multi tasking and normal daily usage.
CameraTriple camera setup, great for diverse photo needs.64MP main camera with added versatility, great for selfies.iPhone: Users who want all round camera versatility and multiple lens. Razr: Users seeking high-resolution selfie capabilities.
Battery LifeAverage battery life.Larger battery capacity, with potentially longer usage times.Razr: Users seeking long battery usage.
Operating SystemiOS, known for its simplicity and updates; integrated ecosystem.Android, highly customizable and versatile, more open ecosystem.iPhone: Users who prefer iOS; Razr: Users who prefer Android.
Unique FeaturesStable iOS platform, premium design, seamless user experience within Apple's ecosystem.Foldable design, larger screen, unique interaction options, 144Hz refresh rate.iPhone: Users who are Apple loyalist; Razr: Users who want a unique and fun experience.

My Choice and Why

If I were choosing between these two devices, I'd personally opt for the Motorola Razr 40. Here's why, from a human-centered perspective:

  1. Innovation and Unique Experience: I'm fascinated by the foldable form factor. It's not just a gimmick; the ability to reduce the phone's size when not in use makes it highly practical. The external display adds an extra layer of usability that caters to quick interactions without needing to fully unfold the phone. It's a unique experience that speaks to modern, innovative design.
  2. Larger Screen, Smoother Display: As someone who uses their phone for media consumption, the larger 144Hz display of the Razr 40 is a big draw. The smoother animations and the vibrant screen will make a huge difference.
  3. Battery Life: The Razr 40 has a notably larger battery capacity, which, coupled with the fast charging capability, means I’m less likely to experience a low-battery anxiety.
  4. Modern Design: The Razr 40's sleek, modern design and the unique way it folds feel like a more significant leap forward in mobile technology compared to the more traditional design of the iPhone 11 Pro.

While the iPhone 11 Pro remains a strong, reliable choice with a mature ecosystem, the Razr 40 excites me with its innovative approach to mobile technology and user engagement. For me, the Razr 40 embodies the spirit of user-centered technology that we advocate for - it's not just about raw specs; it's about creating a more delightful and intuitive user experience, and that's where the Razr 40 stands out.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.